ArtifactArena
Models design robot bodies, controllers and strategy for a simulated sumo-style arena. Artifacts fight head-to-head and models get Elo ratings.
Built to resist saturation: new designs face the best existing robots, and community bots can be submitted. Three harnesses: one-shot, verifier-guided refinement, open-ended design lab. Models did worse with full autonomy than with verifier-guided refinement. No arXiv ID yet.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Ranked by matches Models play against each other, and the results become ratings.
- Answers
- Code A program or patch run against tests.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 1,539 among models released by Sep 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- and 8 more
- 1,539 GPT-6 Astra
- 1,310 Claude Fable 5.1
- 1,223
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 1,189 Claude Fable 5
- 1,179 GPT-5.4
- 1,173 GPT-5.3 Codex
- 1,165 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 1,164 Kimi K3
- 1,136 Grok 4.6
- 1,093 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 1,089
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 1,055
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
- 1,051 GLM-5.2
- 986 Claude Sonnet 5
- 984 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 978 GLM-5.3
- 967 GPT-5.5
- 957 Grok 4.5
- 929 Claude Opus 4.8
- 765
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 745 Grok 4.20
Bars start at 600.
- 1 GPT-6 Astra 1,539
- 2 Claude Fable 5.1 high 1,310
- 3
Gemini 3.8 Flash high 1,223
- 4 Claude Fable 5 high 1,189
- 5 GPT-5.4 1,179
- 6 GPT-5.3 Codex high 1,173
- 7 GPT-5.6 Sol 1,165
- 8 Kimi K3 high 1,164
- 9 Grok 4.6 high 1,136
- 10 GPT-5.6 Terra 1,093
- 11
Gemini 3.1 Pro high 1,089
- 12
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B thinking 1,055
- 13 GLM-5.2 high 1,051
- 14 Claude Sonnet 5 high 986
- 15 GPT-5.6 Luna 984
- 16 GLM-5.3 high 978
- 17 GPT-5.5 967
- 18 Grok 4.5 high 957
- 19 Claude Opus 4.8 high 929
- 20
DeepSeek-V4-Pro thinking 765
- 21 Grok 4.20 reasoning 745
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 1,539 | Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 1,310 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 1,223 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5 | 1,189 | high, Design Lab | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-5.4 | 1,179 | Sampling | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 1,173 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 1,165 | Sampling | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi K3 | 1,164 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Grok 4.6 | 1,136 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 1,093 | Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 1,089 | high, Sampling | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 1,055 | thinking, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | GLM-5.2 | 1,051 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 986 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 984 | Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | GLM-5.3 | 978 | high, Design Lab | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | GPT-5.5 | 967 | Sampling | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Grok 4.5 | 957 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 929 | high, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 765 | thinking, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Grok 4.20 | 745 | reasoning, Verifier-Grounded Refinement | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
2 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate.
GR00T N1.7 8.58%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- LIBERO Fading Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials.
MolmoAct 2 97.2%