ARC-Challenge
Models answer grade-school science multiple-choice questions that retrieval and word co-occurrence baselines got wrong. Scored by accuracy.
Saturated by frontier models, which score above 95%.
In the authors’ words
We present a new question set, text corpus, and baselines assembled to encourage AI research in advanced question answering. Together, these constitute the AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC), which requires far more powerful knowledge and reasoning than previous challenges such as SQuAD or SNLI. The ARC question set is partitioned into a Challenge Set and an Easy Set, where the Challenge Set contains only questions answered incorrectly by both a retrieval-based algorithm and a word co-occurence algorithm. The dataset contains only natural, grade-school science questions (authored for human tests), and is the largest public-domain set of this kind (7,787 questions). We test several baselines on the Challenge Set, including leading neural models from the SQuAD and SNLI tasks, and find that none are able to significantly outperform a random baseline, reflecting the difficult nature of this task. We are also releasing the ARC Corpus, a corpus of 14M science sentences relevant to the task, and implementations of the three neural baseline models tested. Can your model perform better? We pose ARC as a challenge to the community.
- Level
- School Students, from grade school to high school
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Llama 3.1-405B leads with 96.9% among models released by Sep 2025
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 96.9
Llama 3.1-405B
- 96.4 Claude 3 Opus
- 96.3 GPT-4
- 95.3
DeepSeek-V3
- 95.1 PaLM 2-L
- 95.0 Sarvam-M
- 94.8
Llama 3.1-70B
- 94.0
Mistral Large
- 93.2 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 93.0
Llama 3-70B
- 92.3
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
- 91.6
phi-3-medium 14B
- 91.3
Mistral Small 3
- 91.0 Claude 2
- 91.0
Phi-3.5-MoE
- 90.7
phi-3-small 7.4B
- 89.2 Claude 3 Haiku
- 85.8
Mixtral 8x7B
- 85.0
Apertus 70B
- 84.9
phi-3-mini 3.8B
- 84.6
Phi-3.5-mini
- 83.7
Phi-4 Mini
- 83.4
Llama 3.1-8B
- 78.6
Llama 3-8B
- 72.4
Qwen2.5-72B
- 71.4
Gemma 2 27B
- 70.6
Gemma 3 27B
- 68.9
Qwen2-72B
- 68.9
Gemma 3 12B
- 68.4
Gemma 2 9B
- 64.1
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 61.6
Gemma 3n E4B
- 61.0
Falcon-H1-34B
- 57.4
Llama 2-70B
- 56.2
Gemma 3 4B
- 55.5
Mistral 7B v0.1
- 54.5
Llama 2-34B
- 53.5
Falcon-Arabic-7B
- 53.2
Gemma 7B
- 49.9
BitNet b1.58 2B4T
- 49.4
Llama 2-13B
- 45.9
Llama 2-7B
- 42.1
Gemma 2B
- 38.4
Gemma 3 1B
- 28.2
Gemma 3 270M
- 1
Llama 3.1-405B 96.9%
- 2 Claude 3 Opus 96.4%
- 3 GPT-4 Mar 2023 96.3%
- 4
DeepSeek-V3 95.3%
- 5 PaLM 2-L 95.1%
- 6 Sarvam-M 95%
- 7
Llama 3.1-70B 94.8%
- 8
Mistral Large 94%
- 9 Claude 3 Sonnet 93.2%
- 10
Llama 3-70B 93%
- 11
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) 92.3%
- 12
phi-3-medium 14B 91.6%
- 13
Mistral Small 3 91.3%
- 14 Claude 2 91%
- 15
Phi-3.5-MoE 91%
- 16
phi-3-small 7.4B 90.7%
- 17 Claude 3 Haiku 89.2%
- 18
Mixtral 8x7B 85.8%
- 19
Apertus 70B 85%
- 20
phi-3-mini 3.8B 84.9%
- 21
Phi-3.5-mini 84.6%
- 22
Phi-4 Mini 83.7%
- 23
Llama 3.1-8B 83.4%
- 24
Llama 3-8B 78.6%
- 25
Qwen2.5-72B 72.4%
- 26
Gemma 2 27B 71.4%
- 27
Gemma 3 27B 70.6%
- 28
Qwen2-72B 68.9%
- 29
Gemma 3 12B 68.9%
- 30
Gemma 2 9B 68.4%
- 31
DeepSeek LLM 67B 64.1%
- 32
Gemma 3n E4B 61.6%
- 33
Falcon-H1-34B 61%
- 34
Llama 2-70B 57.4%
- 35
Gemma 3 4B 56.2%
- 36
Mistral 7B v0.1 55.5%
- 37
Llama 2-34B 54.5%
- 38
Falcon-Arabic-7B 53.5%
- 39
Gemma 7B 53.2%
- 40
BitNet b1.58 2B4T 49.9%
- 41
Llama 2-13B 49.4%
- 42
Llama 2-7B 45.9%
- 43
Gemma 2B 42.1%
- 44
Gemma 3 1B 38.4%
- 45
Gemma 3 270M 28.2%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 96.9% | Jul 2024 | Model card | |
| 2 | Claude 3 Opus | 96.4% | Mar 2024 | Model card | |
| 3 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 96.3% | Mar 2023 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 95.3% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 5 | PaLM 2-L | 95.1% | May 2023 | Model card | |
| 6 | Sarvam-M | 95% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 94.8% | Jul 2024 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 94% | Feb 2024 | Model card | |
| 9 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 93.2% | Mar 2024 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 93% | Apr 2024 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 92.3% | May 2024 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 91.6% | Aug 2024 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 91.3% | Jan 2025 | Model card | |
| 14 | Claude 2 | 91% | Jul 2023 | Model card | |
| 15 | | 91% | Aug 2024 | Model card | |
| 16 | | 90.7% | Aug 2024 | Model card | |
| 17 | Claude 3 Haiku | 89.2% | Mar 2024 | Model card | |
| 18 | | 85.8% | Dec 2023 | Model card | |
| 19 | | 85% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 20 | | 84.9% | Aug 2024 | Model card | |
| 21 | | 84.6% | Aug 2024 | Model card | |
| 22 | | 83.7% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 23 | | 83.4% | Jul 2024 | Model card | |
| 24 | | 78.6% | Apr 2024 | Model card | |
| 25 | | 72.4% | Sep 2024 | Model card | |
| 26 | | 71.4% | Jun 2024 | Model card | |
| 27 | | 70.6% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 28 | | 68.9% | Jun 2024 | Model card | |
| 29 | | 68.9% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 30 | | 68.4% | Jul 2024 | Model card | |
| 31 | | 64.1% | Jan 2024 | Model card | |
| 32 | | 61.6% | Jun 2025 | Model card | |
| 33 | | 61% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 34 | | 57.4% | Jul 2023 | Model card | |
| 35 | | 56.2% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 36 | | 55.5% | Sep 2023 | Model card | |
| 37 | | 54.5% | Jul 2023 | Model card | |
| 38 | | 53.5% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 39 | | 53.2% | Feb 2024 | Model card | |
| 40 | | 49.9% | Apr 2025 | Model card | |
| 41 | | 49.4% | Jul 2023 | Model card | |
| 42 | | 45.9% | Jul 2023 | Model card | |
| 43 | | 42.1% | Mar 2024 | Model card | |
| 44 | | 38.4% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 45 | | 28.2% | Aug 2025 | Model card |
Epoch AI has scores for 75 models. We plot every source in the charts below.
7 models have held number one since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for Epoch AI’s runs and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Mar 2022
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2025 | 28.2 | ARC-c 0-shot (IT) | |
| 26 Jun 2025 | 61.6 | ARC-c 25-shot (PT) | |
| 23 May 2025 | Sarvam-M | 95 | ARC-C (0.95) |
| 20 May 2025 | 61 | ARC-C | |
| 15 Apr 2025 | 49.9 | ARC-Challenge | |
| 12 Mar 2025 | 70.6 | ARC-c 25-shot (PT) | |
| 26 Feb 2025 | 83.7 | ARC Challenge (10-shot) | |
| 30 Jan 2025 | 91.3 | ARC-c (0-shot) [base] | |
| 26 Dec 2024 | 95.3 | ARC-Challenge (Acc.) | |
| 19 Sep 2024 | 72.4 | ARC-C | |
| 20 Aug 2024 | 91 | ARC Challenge (10-shot) | |
| 23 Jul 2024 | 96.9 | ARC Challenge (0-shot) | |
| 27 Jun 2024 | 71.4 | ARC-c (25-shot) | |
| 7 Jun 2024 | 68.9 | ARC-C | |
| 22 Apr 2024 | 91 | Arc-C (10-Shot) | |
| 18 Apr 2024 | 93 | ARC-Challenge (25-shot) [pretrained] | |
| 4 Mar 2024 | Claude 3 Opus | 96.4 | ARC-Challenge (25-shot) |
| 26 Feb 2024 | 94 | Best of Arc C (25) [Arc C (5) = 94.2] / French Arc-C / German Arc-C / Spanish Arc-C / Italian Arc-C | |
| 21 Feb 2024 | 53.2 | ARC-c | |
| 12 Dec 2023 | ARC challenge (in Commonsense Reasoning average only) | ||
| 11 Dec 2023 | 85.8 | Best of ARC Challenge (25-shot) [detailed table Arc-c: 59.7] / French Arc-c / German Arc-c / Spanish Arc-c / Italian Arc-c | |
| 27 Sep 2023 | 55.5 | Arc-c | |
| 11 Jul 2023 | Claude 2 | 91 | ARC-Challenge (5-shot) |
| 10 May 2023 | 95.1 | ARC-C (4), CoT + SC, Table 5 (Table 2 1-shot = 69.2) | |
| 14 Mar 2023 | GPT-4 | 96.3 | AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) (25-shot) |
39 system cards report it, from 9 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2025 | | 53.5 | ARC Challenge 25-shot (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 17 Sep 2025 | | 85 | ARC Challenge Chat, 0-shot CoT, held-out test suite (Table 21). ARC Challenge Multilingual 37.3 | Capabilities |
| 30 Jul 2025 | | 61 | ARC-C, logprobs 0-shot (Table 24) | Capabilities |
| 16 Apr 2025 | | 49.9 | ARC-Challange (0-shot; Acc,norm) (Table 1, Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 56.2 | ARC-C, PT, 25-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 70.6 | ARC-C, PT, 25-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 38.4 | ARC-C, PT, 25-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 68.9 | ARC-C, PT, 25-shot (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 3 Mar 2025 | | 83.7 | Arc-C (10-Shot) (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 23 Nov 2024 | | 83.4 | ARC Challenge (0-shot), post-trained (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 23 Nov 2024 | | 94.8 | ARC Challenge (0-shot), post-trained (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 23 Nov 2024 | | 96.9 | ARC Challenge (0-shot), post-trained (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 30 Aug 2024 | | 90.7 | Arc-C (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| 30 Aug 2024 | | 84.9 | Arc-C (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| 30 Aug 2024 | | 91.6 | Arc-C (10-Shot) (Section 3 table) | Capabilities |
| 30 Aug 2024 | | 91 | ARC Challenge (10-shot) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 30 Aug 2024 | | 84.6 | ARC Challenge (10-shot) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 31 Jul 2024 | | 68.4 | ARC-C, PT, 25-shot (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| 31 Jul 2024 | | 71.4 | ARC-C, PT, 25-shot (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jul 2024 | | 83.4 | ARC-C, 0-shot, acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jul 2024 | | 94.8 | ARC-C, 0-shot, acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jul 2024 | | 96.9 | ARC-C, 0-shot, acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities |
| 7 May 2024 | | 92.3 | ARC-Challenge 25-shot, DeepSeek-V2 Chat (RL) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 18 Apr 2024 | | 78.6 | ARC-Challenge (25-shot), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| 18 Apr 2024 | | 93 | ARC-Challenge (25-shot), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| 13 Mar 2024 | | 53.2 | ARC-c, PT (Table 6). HuggingFace H6 run (Table 7): 61.9 | Capabilities |
| 13 Mar 2024 | | 42.1 | ARC-c, PT (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 4 Mar 2024 | Claude 3 Sonnet model card | 93.2 | ARC-Challenge, 25-shot (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 4 Mar 2024 | Claude 3 Opus model card | 96.4 | ARC-Challenge, 25-shot (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 4 Mar 2024 | Claude 3 Haiku model card | 89.2 | ARC-Challenge, 25-shot (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 8 Jan 2024 | | 85.8 | ARC Challenge, 25-shot (Table 3). 0-shot 59.7 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 5 Jan 2024 | | 64.1 | ARC-Challenge, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 10 Oct 2023 | | 55.5 | Arc-c, 0-shot (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 19 Jul 2023 | | 45.9 | ARC-c, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| 19 Jul 2023 | | 57.4 | ARC-c, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| 19 Jul 2023 | | 54.5 | ARC-c, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| 19 Jul 2023 | | 49.4 | ARC-c, 0-shot, pretrained (Table 20) | Capabilities |
| 11 Jul 2023 | Claude 2 model card | 91 | ARC-Challenge (5-shot) (4.3) | Capabilities |
| 14 Mar 2023 | GPT-4 technical report | 96.3 | AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC), Challenge-set, 25-shot (Table 2, base model) | Capabilities |
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- BIG-Bench Extra Hard In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is a harmonic mean of task accuracies.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%