Benchmark Almanac

APPS

Claude 3 Opus 70.2% leads since Mar 2024 Dropped

Models write Python programs for 10,000 coding problems that range from introductory to competition level. Generated code runs against test cases.

In the authors’ words

While programming is one of the most broadly applicable skills in modern society, modern machine learning models still cannot code solutions to basic problems. Despite its importance, there has been surprisingly little work on evaluating code generation, and it can be difficult to accurately assess code generation performance rigorously. To meet this challenge, we introduce APPS, a benchmark for code generation. Unlike prior work in more restricted settings, our benchmark measures the ability of models to take an arbitrary natural language specification and generate satisfactory Python code. Similar to how companies assess candidate software developers, we then evaluate models by checking their generated code on test cases. Our benchmark includes 10,000 problems, which range from having simple one-line solutions to being substantial algorithmic challenges. We fine-tune large language models on both GitHub and our training set, and we find that the prevalence of syntax errors is decreasing exponentially as models improve. Recent models such as GPT-Neo can pass approximately 20% of the test cases of introductory problems, so we find that machine learning models are now beginning to learn how to code. As the social significance of automatic code generation increases over the coming years, our benchmark can provide an important measure for tracking advancements.

Abstract of Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS (arXiv:2105.09938, CC0)
Made by UC Berkeley Released May 2021 Competitive programming All tasks public Last in a launch post Mar 2024 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Mar 2024
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
3
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude 3 Opus leads with 70.2% among models released by Mar 2024

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3 Opus 70.2%
  2. 2 Claude 3 Sonnet 55.9%
  3. 3 Claude 3 Haiku 54.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3 Opus 70.2% Mar 2024 Model card
2 Claude 3 Sonnet 55.9% Mar 2024 Model card
3 Claude 3 Haiku 54.8% Mar 2024 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2024

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus

No launch post has listed it since Mar 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
4 Mar 2024 Claude 3 Opus 70.2 APPS (0-shot)

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
4 Mar 2024 Claude 3 Sonnet model card 55.9 APPS, 0-shot (Table 1) Capabilities
4 Mar 2024 Claude 3 Opus model card 70.2 APPS, 0-shot (Table 1) Capabilities
4 Mar 2024 Claude 3 Haiku model card 54.8 APPS, 0-shot (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471