Benchmark Almanac

API-Bank

Llama 3.1-405B 92.3% leads since Jul 2024 Only in system cards

Models make API calls in dialogues that need tools such as calendars and search. Scored on call accuracy.

Llama 3 reports zero-shot function calling accuracy.

In the authors’ words

Recent research has demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) can enhance their capabilities by utilizing external tools. However, three pivotal questions remain unanswered: (1) How effective are current LLMs in utilizing tools? (2) How can we enhance LLMs' ability to utilize tools? (3) What obstacles need to be overcome to leverage tools? To address these questions, we introduce API-Bank, a groundbreaking benchmark, specifically designed for tool-augmented LLMs. For the first question, we develop a runnable evaluation system consisting of 73 API tools. We annotate 314 tool-use dialogues with 753 API calls to assess the existing LLMs' capabilities in planning, retrieving, and calling APIs. For the second question, we construct a comprehensive training set containing 1,888 tool-use dialogues from 2,138 APIs spanning 1,000 distinct domains. Using this dataset, we train Lynx, a tool-augmented LLM initialized from Alpaca. Experimental results demonstrate that GPT-3.5 exhibits improved tool utilization compared to GPT-3, while GPT-4 excels in planning. However, there is still significant potential for further improvement. Moreover, Lynx surpasses Alpaca's tool utilization performance by more than 26 pts and approaches the effectiveness of GPT-3.5. Through error analysis, we highlight the key challenges for future research in this field to answer the third question.

Abstract of API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs (arXiv:2304.08244, CC0)
Made by Alibaba DAMO (Li et al.) Released Apr 2023 Function calling All tasks public Last in a system card Nov 2024 Last model added Nov 2024
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
3
Models scored in lab cards
6
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Llama 3.1-405B leads with 92.3% among models released by Jul 2024

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Llama 3.1-405B 92.3%
  2. 2 Llama 3.1-70B 90%
  3. 3 Llama 3.1-8B 82.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Llama 3.1-405B 92.3% Nov 2024 Model card
2 Llama 3.1-70B 90% Jul 2024 Model card
3 Llama 3.1-8B 82.6% Jul 2024 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jul 2024, by Llama 3.1-405B

The best score passed 85% in Jul 2024

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3.1-405B Llama 3.1-405B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3.1-405B

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

6 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Nov 2024 Llama 3.1-8B technical report 82.6 API-Bank, zero-shot function calling accuracy, post-trained (Table 22) Capabilities
23 Nov 2024 Llama 3.1-70B technical report 90 API-Bank, zero-shot function calling accuracy, post-trained (Table 22) Capabilities
23 Nov 2024 Llama 3.1-405B technical report 92.3 API-Bank, zero-shot function calling accuracy, post-trained (Table 22) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-8B model card 82.6 API-Bank, 0-shot, acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-70B model card 90 API-Bank, 0-shot, acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-405B model card 92 API-Bank, 0-shot, acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) Capabilities

More in Tool use

All 125 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%