Benchmark Almanac

AlgoTune

GPT-5.2 2.05× leads since Dec 2025 Not in model cards

Agents rewrite code for 154 math, physics, and computer science functions to run faster and stay correct. Scoring is harmonic mean speedup over reference code.

In the authors’ words

Despite progress in language model (LM) capabilities, evaluations have thus far focused on models' performance on tasks that humans have previously solved, including in programming (Jimenez et al., 2024) and mathematics (Glazer et al., 2024). We therefore propose testing models' ability to design and implement algorithms in an open-ended benchmark: We task LMs with writing code that efficiently solves computationally challenging problems in computer science, physics, and mathematics. Our AlgoTune benchmark consists of 154 coding tasks collected from domain experts and a framework for validating and timing LM-synthesized solution code, which is compared to reference implementations from popular open-source packages. In addition, we develop a baseline LM agent, AlgoTuner, and evaluate its performance across a suite of frontier models. AlgoTuner uses a simple, budgeted loop that edits code, compiles and runs it, profiles performance, verifies correctness on tests, and selects the fastest valid version. AlgoTuner achieves an average 1.72x speedup against our reference solvers, which use libraries such as SciPy, sk-learn and CVXPY. However, we find that current models fail to discover algorithmic innovations, instead preferring surface-level optimizations. We hope that AlgoTune catalyzes the development of LM agents exhibiting creative problem solving beyond state-of-the-art human performance.

Abstract of AlgoTune: Can Language Models Speed Up General-Purpose Numerical Programs? (arXiv:2507.15887, CC0)
Made by University of Tübingen and Princeton University Released Jul 2025 Speed and optimization All tasks public Last model added Mar 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
18
Models scored on its own leaderboard

GPT-5.2 leads with 2.05× among models released by Mar 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.2 high 2.05×
  2. 2 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 2.02×
  3. 3 GPT-5.4 high 1.85×
  4. 4 Gemini 3 Pro high 1.83×
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.5 high 1.77×
  6. 6 o4-mini high 1.72×
  7. 7 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025, high 1.70×
  8. 8 GPT-5 high 1.67×
  9. 9 GLM-4.5 high 1.52×
  10. 10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 high 1.52×
  11. 11 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, high 1.51×
  12. 12 Claude Opus 4.6 high 1.47×
  13. 13 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B high 1.44×
  14. 14 gpt-oss-120b high 1.41×
  15. 15 GPT-5 mini high 1.38×
  16. 16 Claude Opus 4.1 high 1.34×
  17. 17 Claude Opus 4 high 1.33×
  18. 18 GPT-5 Pro medium 1.31×
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.2 2.05× high Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.1 Pro 2.02× high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.4 1.85× high Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3 Pro 1.83× high Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.5 1.77× high Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
6 o4-mini 1.72× high Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 1.70× high May 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5 1.67× high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GLM-4.5 1.52× high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Sonnet 4.5 1.52× high Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 1.51× high Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Claude Opus 4.6 1.47× high Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 1.44× high Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
14 gpt-oss-120b 1.41× high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5 mini 1.38× high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Opus 4.1 1.34× high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
17 Claude Opus 4 1.33× high May 2025 Official leaderboard
18 GPT-5 Pro 1.31× medium Oct 2025 Official leaderboard

Epoch AI has scores for 18 models. We plot every source in the charts below.

3 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and Epoch AI’s runs.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2026
GPT-5.2 2.05×
Epoch AI runs Not tested since Mar 2026
GPT-5.2 2.05×

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Run or collected by Epoch AI
1.25× 1.50× 1.75× 2.00× 2025 2026 1.25× 1.50× 1.75× 2.00× 2025 2026

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471