Benchmark Almanac

AetherCode

Seed2.1 Pro 65.8% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Models write solutions to problems from premier programming contests such as IOI and ICPC. Expert-validated test suites judge each solution.

Test cases mix automatic generation with human curation to remove weak tests.

In the authors’ words

Competitive programming has emerged as a critical benchmark for evaluating the reasoning and coding capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Despite impressive progress on existing benchmarks, we argue that current evaluations overstate model proficiency, masking a substantial gap between LLMs and elite human programmers. This gap arises from two key limitations: insufficient difficulty and scope of benchmark problems, and evaluation bias from low-quality test cases. To address these shortcomings, we present AetherCode, a new benchmark that draws problems from premier programming competitions such as IOI and ICPC, offering broader coverage and higher difficulty. AetherCode further incorporates comprehensive, expert-validated test suites built through a hybrid of automated generation and human curation, ensuring rigorous and reliable assessment. By combining challenging problem design with robust evaluation, AetherCode provides a more faithful measure of LLM capabilities and sets a new standard for future research in code reasoning.

Abstract of AetherCode: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Win In Premier Programming Competitions (arXiv:2508.16402, CC0)
Made by ByteDance Seed and collaborators (Wang et al.) Released Aug 2025 Competitive programming Last in a launch post Feb 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Competition The strongest students, in olympiad-style contests
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
3
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 65.8% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 65.8%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 60.6%
  3. 3 Seed1.8 38.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 65.8% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 60.6% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Seed1.8 38.2% Dec 2025 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 65.8%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.8

Labs headline it less often now, last in Feb 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 60.6 AetherCode
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 38.2 AetherCode

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 65.8 AetherCode (Table 11) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 38.2 AetherCode (Table 1) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 60.6 AetherCode (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471