ZeroBench
100 hand-made visual questions that all frontier models originally failed. Scored by exact answer, pass@1 and pass@5.
Point releases keep scores comparable: v2 (2025-03) revised questions, v3 (2025-12) clarified two questions and three subquestions. A 2026-08 grading fix raised mean pass@5 by 0.79 points.
In the authors’ words
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) exhibit shortfalls when interpreting images and, by some measures, have poorer spatial cognition than young children or animals. Despite this, they attain high scores on many popular visual benchmarks, with headroom rapidly eroded by model progress. This creates a need for difficult benchmarks that remain relevant for longer. We introduce ZeroBench - a lightweight visual reasoning benchmark curated using adversarial filtering to be "impossible" for frontier LMMs at its original release, with initial SotA scores of 0% pass@1 and pass^5. We track progress on ZeroBench over the subsequent year, observing SotA reaching 6% pass^5 and 19% pass@5, indicating the potential longevity of the benchmark. We evaluate 46 LMMs on ZeroBench, compare performance to a human baseline, analyse strengths and weaknesses, chart a year of progress in visual capabilities, and publicly release ZeroBench at https://zerobench.github.io.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 52%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 52.0 GPT-6 Astra
- 43.0 Claude Opus 5.5
- 41.0 GPT-6 Sol
- 30.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 26.0 Claude Opus 5
- 24.0 Claude Fable 5
- 23.0 GPT-5.4
- 23.0 GPT-5.5
- 22.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 21.0 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 20.0
Gemini 3 Pro
- 20.0 GPT-6 Luna
- 19.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 19.0 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 18.0 GPT-5.2
- 18.0 Claude Opus 4.8
- 18.0
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 17.0 Grok 4.6
- 15.0
Gemini 3 Flash
- 15.0 Claude Opus 4.7
- 15.0 Grok 4.5
- 14.0
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 13.0 Grok 4.3
- 13.0 Claude Sonnet 5
- 12.0 Claude Opus 4.6
- 12.0 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 11.0 o4-mini
- 11.0 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 10.0 Grok 4.20
- 9.00 GPT-5 mini
- 9.00 Claude Opus 4.5
- 8.00 Claude Opus 4.1
- 7.00 GPT-5
- 6.00 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 6.00 GPT-4.5
- 6.00 o3
- 6.00 Claude Opus 4
- 6.00 Claude Sonnet 4
- 6.00 Grok 4
- 6.00 GPT-5.1
- 5.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
- 5.00
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 5.00 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 5.00
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
- 3.00 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 3.00
Pixtral Large
- 3.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 3.00
Llama 4 Scout
- 3.00 GPT-4.1
- 3.00 GPT-5 nano
- 3.00
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 2.00 QVQ
- 2.00
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
- 2.00 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 2.00 GPT-4o mini
- 2.00
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 2.00
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 2.00
Llama 4 Maverick
- 1.00 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 1.00 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
- 1.00
NVLM-D-72B
- 0.0 Claude 3 Opus
- 0.0 Claude 3 Haiku
- 0.0
Llama 3.2 90B
- 0.0 o1
- 0.0 GPT-4o
- 0.0 Reka Edge
- 1 GPT-6 Astra max 52%
- 2 Claude Opus 5.5 max 43%
- 3 GPT-6 Sol max 41%
- 4 GPT-5.6 Sol max 30%
- 5 Claude Opus 5 max 26%
- 6 Claude Fable 5 max 24%
- 7 GPT-5.4 xhigh 23%
- 8 GPT-5.5 xhigh 23%
- 9
Gemini 3.5 Flash 22%
- 10 GPT-5.6 Luna max 21%
- 11
Gemini 3 Pro 20%
- 12 GPT-6 Luna max 20%
- 13
Gemini 3.1 Pro 19%
- 14 GPT-5.6 Terra max 19%
- 15 GPT-5.2 medium 18%
- 16 Claude Opus 4.8 18%
- 17
Gemini 3.6 Flash high 18%
- 18 Grok 4.6 xhigh 17%
- 19
Gemini 3 Flash 15%
- 20 Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh 15%
- 21 Grok 4.5 high 15%
- 22
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high 14%
- 23 Grok 4.3 high 13%
- 24 Claude Sonnet 5 max 13%
- 25 Claude Opus 4.6 12%
- 26 Claude Sonnet 4.6 12%
- 27 o4-mini 11%
- 28 GPT-5.4 Mini 11%
- 29 Grok 4.20 reasoning 10%
- 30 GPT-5 mini high 9.00%
- 31 Claude Opus 4.5 9.00%
- 32 Claude Opus 4.1 thinking 8.00%
- 33 GPT-5 medium 7.00%
- 34 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 6.00%
- 35 GPT-4.5 6.00%
- 36 o3 6.00%
- 37 Claude Opus 4 thinking 6.00%
- 38 Claude Sonnet 4 6.00%
- 39 Grok 4 6.00%
- 40 GPT-5.1 medium 6.00%
- 41
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 5.00%
- 42
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 5.00%
- 43 Claude Sonnet 4.5 5.00%
- 44
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 5.00%
- 45 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 3.00%
- 46
Pixtral Large 3.00%
- 47
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 3.00%
- 48
Llama 4 Scout 3.00%
- 49 GPT-4.1 3.00%
- 50 GPT-5 nano high 3.00%
- 51
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 3.00%
- 52 QVQ 2.00%
- 53
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision 2.00%
- 54 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 2.00%
- 55 GPT-4o mini 2.00%
- 56
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 2.00%
- 57
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 2.00%
- 58
Llama 4 Maverick 2.00%
- 59 Claude 3 Sonnet 1.00%
- 60 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 1.00%
- 61
NVLM-D-72B 1.00%
- 62 Claude 3 Opus 0%
- 63 Claude 3 Haiku 0%
- 64
Llama 3.2 90B 0%
- 65 o1 0%
- 66 GPT-4o Mar 2025 0%
- 67 Reka Edge 0%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 52% | max | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 43% | max | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-6 Sol | 41% | max | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 30% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5 | 26% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5 | 24% | max | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-5.4 | 23% | xhigh | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.5 | 23% | xhigh | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 22% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 21% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 20% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GPT-6 Luna | 20% | max | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 19% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 19% | max | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5.2 | 18% | medium | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 18% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 18% | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Grok 4.6 | 17% | xhigh | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 15% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 15% | xhigh | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Grok 4.5 | 15% | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 14% | high | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | Grok 4.3 | 13% | high | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 13% | max | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 12% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 12% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | o4-mini | 11% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 11% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | Grok 4.20 | 10% | reasoning | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | GPT-5 mini | 9.00% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 9.00% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 8.00% | thinking | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | GPT-5 | 7.00% | medium | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 6.00% | thinking | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | GPT-4.5 | 6.00% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | o3 | 6.00% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Claude Opus 4 | 6.00% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 38 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 6.00% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | Grok 4 | 6.00% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | GPT-5.1 | 6.00% | medium | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 41 | | 5.00% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 5.00% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 5.00% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 5.00% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 3.00% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 3.00% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 3.00% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 3.00% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | GPT-4.1 | 3.00% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | GPT-5 nano | 3.00% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 51 | | 3.00% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | QVQ | 2.00% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 53 | | 2.00% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 2.00% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | GPT-4o mini | 2.00% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 2.00% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | | 2.00% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | 2.00% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 1.00% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | 1.00% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | | 1.00% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | Claude 3 Opus | 0% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | Claude 3 Haiku | 0% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | | 0% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | o1 | 0% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 0% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 67 | Reka Edge | 0% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 25 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
The best score, 52%, costs $0.56 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Astra | max | 52% | $0.56 | ||
| Claude Opus 5.5 | max | 43% | $1.11 | ||
| GPT-6 Sol | max | 41% | $0.17 | ||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | max | 30% | $0.76 | ||
| Claude Opus 5 | max | 26% | $0.68 | ||
| Claude Fable 5 | max | 24% | $1.01 | ||
| GPT-5.4 | xhigh | 23% | $0.30 | ||
| GPT-5.5 | xhigh | 23% | $0.55 | ||
| | 22% | $0.18 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Luna | max | 21% | $0.28 | ||
| | 20% | $0.22 | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | max | 20% | $0.02 | ||
| | 19% | $0.25 | |||
| GPT-5.6 Terra | max | 19% | $0.55 | ||
| GPT-5.2 | medium | 18% | $0.06 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 18% | $0.81 | |||
| | high | 18% | $0.14 | ||
| Grok 4.6 | xhigh | 17% | $0.15 | ||
| | 15% | $0.07 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | xhigh | 15% | $0.32 | ||
| Grok 4.5 | high | 15% | $0.15 | ||
| | high | 14% | $0.03 | ||
| Grok 4.3 | high | 13% | $0.05 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | max | 13% | $0.69 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | 12% | $0.72 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 12% | $0.35 | |||
| o4-mini | 11% | $0.07 | |||
| GPT-5.4 Mini | 11% | $0.19 | |||
| Grok 4.20 | reasoning | 10% | $0.11 | ||
| Grok 4.20 | non-reasoning | 10% | $0.07 | ||
| GPT-5 mini | high | 9.00% | $0.02 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 9.00% | $0.47 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.1 | thinking | 8.00% | $0.50 | ||
| GPT-5 | medium | 7.00% | $0.05 | ||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | thinking | 6.00% | $0.19 | ||
| GPT-4.5 | 6.00% | $0.15 | |||
| o3 | 6.00% | $0.23 | |||
| Claude Opus 4 | thinking | 6.00% | $0.46 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 6.00% | $0.01 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | thinking | 6.00% | $0.17 | ||
| Grok 4 | 6.00% | $0.31 | |||
| GPT-5.1 | medium | 6.00% | $0.05 | ||
| | 5.00% | ||||
| | 5.00% | $0.01 | |||
| Claude Opus 4.1 | 5.00% | $0.07 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 5.00% | $0.02 | |||
| | 5.00% | $0.02 | |||
| Claude Opus 4 | 4.00% | $0.07 | |||
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 3.00% | $0.009 | |||
| | 3.00% | $0.01 | |||
| | 3.00% | $0.0004 | |||
| | 3.00% | $0.0005 | |||
| GPT-4.1 | 3.00% | $0.007 | |||
| GPT-5 nano | high | 3.00% | $0.003 | ||
| | 3.00% | $0.003 | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | thinking | 3.00% | $0.20 | ||
| | 2.00% | $0.0002 | |||
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 2.00% | $0.009 | |||
| GPT-4o mini | 2.00% | $0.0004 | |||
| | 2.00% | $6.05 | |||
| | 2.00% | $0.003 | |||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 2.00% | $0.01 | |||
| | 2.00% | $0.0006 | |||
| Claude 3 Sonnet | 1.00% | $0.009 | |||
| Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | 1.00% | $0.001 | |||
| | 1.00% | ||||
| Claude 3 Opus | 0% | $0.05 | |||
| Claude 3 Haiku | 0% | $0.0008 | |||
| | 0% | $0.0004 | |||
| o1 | 0% | $0.45 | |||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 0% | $0.007 | |||
| Reka Edge | 0% | $5.30 |
8 models have held number one since its release in Feb 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
5 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 39 | ZeroBench_main (avg@5 / pass@5) 29.8 / 39.0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 51 | ZeroBench-main (w/tools) | |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 50 | ZeroBench (w/ tools) | |
| 10 Sep 2026 | 49 | ZeroBench-main w/ tools (Pass@5) | |
| 21 Aug 2026 | 35 | ZeroBench (Pass@5) | |
| 3 Aug 2026 | 49 | Best of ZeroBench (Pass@5) (without CI / with CI) 24.0 / 49.0 / ZeroBench-Sub | |
| 16 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 | 23 | ZeroBench (pass@5) (without python) |
| 23 Jun 2026 | 22 | ZEROBench (w. Tool) 18.0 (22.0), main set | |
| 15 Apr 2026 | 34.4 | ZEROBench_sub | |
| 8 Apr 2026 | 33 | ZeroBench (Multi-Step Visual Reasoning (pass@5) - With Python) | |
| 30 Mar 2026 | 34.4 | Best of ZEROBench 5 / ZEROBench_sub 34.4 | |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 36.2 | Best of ZEROBench 9 / ZEROBench_sub 36.2 | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 12 | Best of ZEROBench / ZEROBench_sub | |
| 27 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 | 9 | ZeroBench |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 11 | ZeroBench (main) | |
| 8 Dec 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 25.8 | ZeroBench (sub) |
| 23 Sep 2025 | 27.7 | Best of ZEROBench 4.0 / ZEROBench_Sub 27.7 | |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 23.4 | ZeroBench (sub) |
| 31 Jul 2025 | 23 | ZeroBench (sub) | |
| 12 May 2025 | 2 | ZeroBench (main) 2 (sub 30.8) |
16 system cards report it, from 8 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sep 2026 | | 49 | ZeroBench-main w/ tools (Pass@5) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 27 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 23 | ZeroBench-main (pass@5) without Python, cell 23.0 / 41.0, 5 runs (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 18 | ZeroBench (main), no tools, 22.0 with tools. ZeroBench (sub) 49.4, 56.3 with tools (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 17 Apr 2026 | | 5 | ZEROBench 5, ZEROBench_sub 34.4 (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 11 | ZeroBench (main) (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 12 | ZeroBench (main) 12.0, ZeroBench (sub) 47.6 (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 9 | ZeroBench without tools, 11 with tools (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 14 Jan 2026 | | 1 | ZeroBench (main), SeRe, sub 27.54 (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe main 5.00, sub 29.94 | Capabilities |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 25.8 | ZeroBench (sub), GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 4 | ZeroBench (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 18.3 | ZeroBench (sub), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 15.0 | Capabilities |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 23.4 | ZeroBench (sub), GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 4.5 | ZeroBench, Gemini as judge, average of 4 runs (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 2 | ZeroBench, Gemini as judge, average of 4 runs (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 19.2 | ZeroBench (sub), GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 2 | ZeroBench (main) 2, ZeroBench (sub) 30.8, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking main 0, sub 29.0 | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%