Benchmark Almanac

ZeroBench

GPT-6 Astra 52% leads since Sep 2026 In use

100 hand-made visual questions that all frontier models originally failed. Scored by exact answer, pass@1 and pass@5.

Point releases keep scores comparable: v2 (2025-03) revised questions, v3 (2025-12) clarified two questions and three subquestions. A 2026-08 grading fix raised mean pass@5 by 0.79 points.

In the authors’ words

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) exhibit shortfalls when interpreting images and, by some measures, have poorer spatial cognition than young children or animals. Despite this, they attain high scores on many popular visual benchmarks, with headroom rapidly eroded by model progress. This creates a need for difficult benchmarks that remain relevant for longer. We introduce ZeroBench - a lightweight visual reasoning benchmark curated using adversarial filtering to be "impossible" for frontier LMMs at its original release, with initial SotA scores of 0% pass@1 and pass^5. We track progress on ZeroBench over the subsequent year, observing SotA reaching 6% pass^5 and 19% pass@5, indicating the potential longevity of the benchmark. We evaluate 46 LMMs on ZeroBench, compare performance to a human baseline, analyse strengths and weaknesses, chart a year of progress in visual capabilities, and publicly release ZeroBench at https://zerobench.github.io.

Abstract of ZeroBench: An Impossible Visual Benchmark for Contemporary Large Multimodal Models (arXiv:2502.09696, CC0)
Made by University of Cambridge and others Released Feb 2025 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
67
Entries on its own leaderboard, 66 models we track
20
Launch posts list it, from 7 labs
16
System cards report it, from 8 labs

GPT-6 Astra leads with 52%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 GPT-6 Astra max 52%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5.5 max 43%
  3. 3 GPT-6 Sol max 41%
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Sol max 30%
  5. 5 Claude Opus 5 max 26%
  6. 6 Claude Fable 5 max 24%
  7. 7 GPT-5.4 xhigh 23%
  8. 8 GPT-5.5 xhigh 23%
  9. 9 Gemini 3.5 Flash 22%
  10. 10 GPT-5.6 Luna max 21%
  11. 11 Gemini 3 Pro 20%
  12. 12 GPT-6 Luna max 20%
  13. 13 Gemini 3.1 Pro 19%
  14. 14 GPT-5.6 Terra max 19%
  15. 15 GPT-5.2 medium 18%
  16. 16 Claude Opus 4.8 18%
  17. 17 Gemini 3.6 Flash high 18%
  18. 18 Grok 4.6 xhigh 17%
  19. 19 Gemini 3 Flash 15%
  20. 20 Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh 15%
  21. 21 Grok 4.5 high 15%
  22. 22 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high 14%
  23. 23 Grok 4.3 high 13%
  24. 24 Claude Sonnet 5 max 13%
  25. 25 Claude Opus 4.6 12%
  26. 26 Claude Sonnet 4.6 12%
  27. 27 o4-mini 11%
  28. 28 GPT-5.4 Mini 11%
  29. 29 Grok 4.20 reasoning 10%
  30. 30 GPT-5 mini high 9.00%
  31. 31 Claude Opus 4.5 9.00%
  32. 32 Claude Opus 4.1 thinking 8.00%
  33. 33 GPT-5 medium 7.00%
  34. 34 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 6.00%
  35. 35 GPT-4.5 6.00%
  36. 36 o3 6.00%
  37. 37 Claude Opus 4 thinking 6.00%
  38. 38 Claude Sonnet 4 6.00%
  39. 39 Grok 4 6.00%
  40. 40 GPT-5.1 medium 6.00%
  41. 41 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 5.00%
  42. 42 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 5.00%
  43. 43 Claude Sonnet 4.5 5.00%
  44. 44 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 5.00%
  45. 45 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 3.00%
  46. 46 Pixtral Large 3.00%
  47. 47 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 3.00%
  48. 48 Llama 4 Scout 3.00%
  49. 49 GPT-4.1 3.00%
  50. 50 GPT-5 nano high 3.00%
  51. 51 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 3.00%
  52. 52 QVQ 2.00%
  53. 53 Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision 2.00%
  54. 54 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 2.00%
  55. 55 GPT-4o mini 2.00%
  56. 56 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 2.00%
  57. 57 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 2.00%
  58. 58 Llama 4 Maverick 2.00%
  59. 59 Claude 3 Sonnet 1.00%
  60. 60 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 1.00%
  61. 61 NVLM-D-72B 1.00%
  62. 62 Claude 3 Opus 0%
  63. 63 Claude 3 Haiku 0%
  64. 64 Llama 3.2 90B 0%
  65. 65 o1 0%
  66. 66 GPT-4o Mar 2025 0%
  67. 67 Reka Edge 0%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Astra 52% max Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 5.5 43% max Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Sol 41% max Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Sol 30% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 5 26% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Fable 5 24% max Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-5.4 23% xhigh Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5.5 23% xhigh Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 3.5 Flash 22% May 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5.6 Luna 21% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Gemini 3 Pro 20% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-6 Luna 20% max Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Gemini 3.1 Pro 19% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GPT-5.6 Terra 19% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-5.2 18% medium Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Opus 4.8 18% May 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Gemini 3.6 Flash 18% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Grok 4.6 17% xhigh Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 3 Flash 15% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Claude Opus 4.7 15% xhigh Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Grok 4.5 15% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 14% high Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Grok 4.3 13% high Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Claude Sonnet 5 13% max Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Opus 4.6 12% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
26 Claude Sonnet 4.6 12% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
27 o4-mini 11% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
28 GPT-5.4 Mini 11% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
29 Grok 4.20 10% reasoning Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
30 GPT-5 mini 9.00% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
31 Claude Opus 4.5 9.00% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
32 Claude Opus 4.1 8.00% thinking Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
33 GPT-5 7.00% medium Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 6.00% thinking Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
35 GPT-4.5 6.00% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
36 o3 6.00% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Claude Opus 4 6.00% thinking May 2025 Official leaderboard
38 Claude Sonnet 4 6.00% May 2025 Official leaderboard
39 Grok 4 6.00% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
40 GPT-5.1 6.00% medium Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
41 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 5.00% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
42 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 5.00% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
43 Claude Sonnet 4.5 5.00% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
44 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 5.00% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
45 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 3.00% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
46 Pixtral Large 3.00% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
47 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 3.00% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
48 Llama 4 Scout 3.00% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
49 GPT-4.1 3.00% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
50 GPT-5 nano 3.00% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
51 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 3.00% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
52 QVQ 2.00% Official leaderboard
53 Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision 2.00% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
54 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 2.00% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
55 GPT-4o mini 2.00% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
56 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 2.00% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
57 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 2.00% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
58 Llama 4 Maverick 2.00% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
59 Claude 3 Sonnet 1.00% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
60 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 1.00% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
61 NVLM-D-72B 1.00% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
62 Claude 3 Opus 0% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
63 Claude 3 Haiku 0% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
64 Llama 3.2 90B 0% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
65 o1 0% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
66 GPT-4o Mar 2025 0% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
67 Reka Edge 0% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 25 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

The best score, 52%, costs $0.56 a task

Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.

Google DeepMind Anthropic OpenAI Cost frontier One model at each effort level
0% 20% 40% 60% $0.0001 $0.001 $0.01 $0.10 $1.00 $10 Cost per task, log scale GPT-6 Astra, max GPT-6 Sol, max GPT-6 Luna, max Claude Sonnet 4 Gemini 2.0 Flash 0% 20% 40% 60% $0.0001 $0.001 $0.01 $0.10 $1.00 $10 Cost per task, log scale GPT-6 Astra, max GPT-6 Sol, max
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-6 Astra max 52% $0.56
Claude Opus 5.5 max 43% $1.11
GPT-6 Sol max 41% $0.17
GPT-5.6 Sol max 30% $0.76
Claude Opus 5 max 26% $0.68
Claude Fable 5 max 24% $1.01
GPT-5.4 xhigh 23% $0.30
GPT-5.5 xhigh 23% $0.55
Gemini 3.5 Flash 22% $0.18
GPT-5.6 Luna max 21% $0.28
Gemini 3 Pro 20% $0.22
GPT-6 Luna max 20% $0.02
Gemini 3.1 Pro 19% $0.25
GPT-5.6 Terra max 19% $0.55
GPT-5.2 medium 18% $0.06
Claude Opus 4.8 18% $0.81
Gemini 3.6 Flash high 18% $0.14
Grok 4.6 xhigh 17% $0.15
Gemini 3 Flash 15% $0.07
Claude Opus 4.7 xhigh 15% $0.32
Grok 4.5 high 15% $0.15
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high 14% $0.03
Grok 4.3 high 13% $0.05
Claude Sonnet 5 max 13% $0.69
Claude Opus 4.6 12% $0.72
Claude Sonnet 4.6 12% $0.35
o4-mini 11% $0.07
GPT-5.4 Mini 11% $0.19
Grok 4.20 reasoning 10% $0.11
Grok 4.20 non-reasoning 10% $0.07
GPT-5 mini high 9.00% $0.02
Claude Opus 4.5 9.00% $0.47
Claude Opus 4.1 thinking 8.00% $0.50
GPT-5 medium 7.00% $0.05
Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 6.00% $0.19
GPT-4.5 6.00% $0.15
o3 6.00% $0.23
Claude Opus 4 thinking 6.00% $0.46
Claude Sonnet 4 6.00% $0.01
Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 6.00% $0.17
Grok 4 6.00% $0.31
GPT-5.1 medium 6.00% $0.05
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 5.00%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 5.00% $0.01
Claude Opus 4.1 5.00% $0.07
Claude Sonnet 4.5 5.00% $0.02
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 5.00% $0.02
Claude Opus 4 4.00% $0.07
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 3.00% $0.009
Pixtral Large 3.00% $0.01
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 3.00% $0.0004
Llama 4 Scout 3.00% $0.0005
GPT-4.1 3.00% $0.007
GPT-5 nano high 3.00% $0.003
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 3.00% $0.003
Claude Sonnet 4.5 thinking 3.00% $0.20
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision 2.00% $0.0002
Claude 3.5 Sonnet 2.00% $0.009
GPT-4o mini 2.00% $0.0004
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 2.00% $6.05
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 2.00% $0.003
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 2.00% $0.01
Llama 4 Maverick 2.00% $0.0006
Claude 3 Sonnet 1.00% $0.009
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 1.00% $0.001
NVLM-D-72B 1.00%
Claude 3 Opus 0% $0.05
Claude 3 Haiku 0% $0.0008
Llama 3.2 90B 0% $0.0004
o1 0% $0.45
GPT-4o Mar 2025 0% $0.007
Reka Edge 0% $5.30

8 models have held number one since its release in Feb 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind Anthropic OpenAI ByteDance Seed Z.ai StepFun Qwen Meta DeepSeek
Own leaderboard 8 leaders
Lab claims 9 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B GLM-4.5V GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking o4-mini Claude 3.7 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-6 Astra Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

5 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
StepFun
Z.ai
Qwen
Moonshot AI
Meta
DeepSeek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
24 Oct 2026 Kimi K3.1 Pro 39 ZeroBench_main (avg@5 / pass@5) 29.8 / 39.0
17 Oct 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 51 ZeroBench-main (w/tools)
15 Oct 2026 Muse Spark Open 50 ZeroBench (w/ tools)
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 49 ZeroBench-main w/ tools (Pass@5)
21 Aug 2026 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp 35 ZeroBench (Pass@5)
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 49 Best of ZeroBench (Pass@5) (without CI / with CI) 24.0 / 49.0 / ZeroBench-Sub
16 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 23 ZeroBench (pass@5) (without python)
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro 22 ZEROBench (w. Tool) 18.0 (22.0), main set
15 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 34.4 ZEROBench_sub
8 Apr 2026 Muse Spark 33 ZeroBench (Multi-Step Visual Reasoning (pass@5) - With Python)
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 34.4 Best of ZEROBench 5 / ZEROBench_sub 34.4
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 36.2 Best of ZEROBench 9 / ZEROBench_sub 36.2
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 12 Best of ZEROBench / ZEROBench_sub
27 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 9 ZeroBench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 11 ZeroBench (main)
8 Dec 2025 GLM-4.6V 25.8 ZeroBench (sub)
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 27.7 Best of ZEROBench 4.0 / ZEROBench_Sub 27.7
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 23.4 ZeroBench (sub)
31 Jul 2025 Step 3 23 ZeroBench (sub)
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 2 ZeroBench (main) 2 (sub 30.8)

16 system cards report it, from 8 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash technical report 49 ZeroBench-main w/ tools (Pass@5) (Table 3) Capabilities
27 Jul 2026 Kimi K3 technical report 23 ZeroBench-main (pass@5) without Python, cell 23.0 / 41.0, 5 runs (Table 2) Capabilities
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 18 ZeroBench (main), no tools, 22.0 with tools. ZeroBench (sub) 49.4, 56.3 with tools (Table 9) Capabilities
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 5 ZEROBench 5, ZEROBench_sub 34.4 (Table 6) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 11 ZeroBench (main) (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 12 ZeroBench (main) 12.0, ZeroBench (sub) 47.6 (Table 8) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 9 ZeroBench without tools, 11 with tools (Table 4) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 1 ZeroBench (main), SeRe, sub 27.54 (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe main 5.00, sub 29.94 Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 25.8 ZeroBench (sub), GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 4 ZeroBench (Table 2) Capabilities
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 18.3 ZeroBench (sub), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 15.0 Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 23.4 ZeroBench (sub), GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Pro technical report 4.5 ZeroBench, Gemini as judge, average of 4 runs (Table 3) Capabilities
7 Jul 2025 Gemini 2.5 Flash technical report 2 ZeroBench, Gemini as judge, average of 4 runs (Table 3) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 19.2 ZeroBench (sub), GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 2 ZeroBench (main) 2, ZeroBench (sub) 30.8, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking main 0, sub 29.0 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%