Benchmark Almanac

XLRS-Bench

Intern-S1 55% leads since Jul 2025 Fading

Models answer perception and reasoning questions about extremely large, ultra-high-resolution remote sensing images.

In the authors’ words

The astonishing breakthrough of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has necessitated new benchmarks to quantitatively assess their capabilities, reveal their limitations, and indicate future research directions. However, this is challenging in the context of remote sensing (RS), since the imagery features ultra-high resolution that incorporates extremely complex semantic relationships. Existing benchmarks usually adopt notably smaller image sizes than real-world RS scenarios, suffer from limited annotation quality, and consider insufficient dimensions of evaluation. To address these issues, we present XLRS-Bench: a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the perception and reasoning capabilities of MLLMs in ultra-high-resolution RS scenarios. XLRS-Bench boasts the largest average image size (8500×8500) observed thus far, with all evaluation samples meticulously annotated manually, assisted by a novel semi-automatic captioner on ultra-high-resolution RS images. On top of the XLRS-Bench, 16 sub-tasks are defined to evaluate MLLMs' 10 kinds of perceptual capabilities and 6 kinds of reasoning capabilities, with a primary emphasis on advanced cognitive processes that facilitate real-world decision-making and the capture of spatiotemporal changes. The results of both general and RS-focused MLLMs on XLRS-Bench indicate that further efforts are needed for real-world RS applications. We have open-sourced XLRS-Bench to support further research in developing more powerful MLLMs for remote sensing.

Abstract of XLRS-Bench: Could Your Multimodal LLMs Understand Extremely Large Ultra-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery? (arXiv:2503.23771, CC0)
Made by XLRS-Bench team (Fengxiang Wang et al.) Released Mar 2025 Detection and captioning All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
4
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Intern-S1 leads with 55% among models released by Sep 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Intern-S1 55%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 54.6%
  3. 3 Intern-S1-Pro 52.8%
  4. 4 Intern-S2-397B 51.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Intern-S1 55% Jul 2025 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 54.6% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Intern-S1-Pro 52.8% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Intern-S2-397B 51.4% Sep 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Shanghai AI Lab
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026
Intern-S1 55%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S1

Labs headline it less often now, last in Sep 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
13 Sep 2026 Intern-S2-397B 51.4 XLRS-Bench (Remote Sensing)
2 Feb 2026 Intern-S1-Pro 52.8 XLRS-Bench
24 Jul 2025 Intern-S1 55 XLRS-Bench

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
26 Mar 2026 Intern-S1-Pro technical report 52.8 XLRS-Bench, Remote Sensing, thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 54.6 XLRS-Bench (macro), lite subset (Table 8) Capabilities
21 Aug 2025 Intern-S1 technical report 55 XLRS-Bench (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%