VQAv2
Open-ended questions about COCO images, balanced to reduce language priors. Scored by consensus accuracy against 10 human answers.
Saturated legacy benchmark.
In the authors’ words
Problems at the intersection of vision and language are of significant importance both as challenging research questions and for the rich set of applications they enable. However, inherent structure in our world and bias in our language tend to be a simpler signal for learning than visual modalities, resulting in models that ignore visual information, leading to an inflated sense of their capability. We propose to counter these language priors for the task of Visual Question Answering (VQA) and make vision (the V in VQA) matter! Specifically, we balance the popular VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question in our balanced dataset is associated with not just a single image, but rather a pair of similar images that result in two different answers to the question. Our dataset is by construction more balanced than the original VQA dataset and has approximately twice the number of image-question pairs. Our complete balanced dataset is publicly available at www.visualqa.org as part of the 2nd iteration of the Visual Question Answering Dataset and Challenge (VQA v2.0). We further benchmark a number of state-of-art VQA models on our balanced dataset. All models perform significantly worse on our balanced dataset, suggesting that these models have indeed learned to exploit language priors. This finding provides the first concrete empirical evidence for what seems to be a qualitative sense among practitioners. Finally, our data collection protocol for identifying complementary images enables us to develop a novel interpretable model, which in addition to providing an answer to the given (image, question) pair, also provides a counter-example based explanation. Specifically, it identifies an image that is similar to the original image, but it believes has a different answer to the same question. This can help in building trust for machines among their users.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Reka Edge leads with 88.4% among models released by Mar 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1 Reka Edge 88.4%
- 2
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 80.2%
- 3
Gemini 1.0 Ultra 77.8%
- 4 GPT-4 Mar 2023 77.2%
- 5
Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 73.2%
- 6
Gemma 3 27B 72.9%
- 7
Gemma 3 12B 71.6%
- 8
Gemma 3 4B 62.4%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reka Edge | 88.4% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 80.2% | May 2024 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 77.8% | Dec 2023 | Model card | |
| 4 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 77.2% | Mar 2023 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 73.2% | Feb 2024 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 72.9% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 71.6% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 62.4% | Mar 2025 | Model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 11 entries, 2 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.
4 models have held number one since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Sep 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Mar 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Mar 2026 | Reka Edge | 88.4 | VQA-V2 |
| 12 Mar 2025 | 72.9 | VQAv2 (PT); IT VQAv2 (val) = 71.0 | |
| 14 May 2024 | 80.2 | VQAv2 (test-dev), 0-shot | |
| 15 Feb 2024 | 73.2 | VQAv2 (test-dev), 0-shot | |
| 6 Dec 2023 | 77.8 | VQAv2 (test-dev) | |
| 14 Mar 2023 | GPT-4 | 77.2 | VQAv2 VQA score (test-dev) 0-shot |
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 62.4 | VQAv2 (val), IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 71 | VQAv2 (val), IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 71.6 | VQAv2 (val), IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%