Benchmark Almanac

VCR (Visual Caption Restoration)

Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 75.6% leads since Aug 2024 Only in system cards

Models restore caption text that is partly covered in an image, using only the visible pixel fragments. Scored by exact match and Jaccard similarity of the words.

English and Chinese splits in easy and hard settings. Not the older Visual Commonsense Reasoning dataset with the same short name. OpenVLM lists it for 56 models.

In the authors’ words

We introduce Visual Caption Restoration (VCR), a novel vision-language task that challenges models to accurately restore partially obscured texts using pixel-level hints within images. This task stems from the observation that text embedded in images is intrinsically different from common visual elements and natural language due to the need to align the modalities of vision, text, and text embedded in images. While numerous works have integrated text embedded in images into visual question-answering tasks, approaches to these tasks generally rely on optical character recognition or masked language modeling, thus reducing the task to mainly text-based processing. However, text-based processing becomes ineffective in VCR as accurate text restoration depends on the combined information from provided images, context, and subtle cues from the tiny exposed areas of masked texts. We develop a pipeline to generate synthetic images for the VCR task using image-caption pairs, with adjustable caption visibility to control the task difficulty. With this pipeline, we construct a dataset for VCR called VCR-Wiki using images with captions from Wikipedia, comprising 2.11M English and 346K Chinese entities in both easy and hard split variants. Our results reveal that current vision language models significantly lag behind human performance in the VCR task, and merely fine-tuning the models on our dataset does not lead to notable improvements. We release VCR-Wiki and the data construction code to facilitate future research.

Abstract of VCR: A Task for Pixel-Level Complex Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Restoring Occluded Text (arXiv:2406.06462, CC0)
Made by Tianyu Zhang et al. (vcr-org) Released Jun 2024 Documents, charts and text in images All tasks public Last in a system card Nov 2025 Last model added Nov 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
48
Entries on its own leaderboard, 42 models we track
3
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct leads with 75.6% among models released by Aug 2024

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 75.6%
  2. 2 Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 61.3%
  3. 3 GPT-4o May 2024, detail-low 51.8%
  4. 4 GLM-4V-9B 49.8%
  5. 5 InternVL2-Llama3-76B 48.3%
  6. 6 InternVL2-40B 47.5%
  7. 7 GPT-4o mini detail-high 42%
  8. 8 InternVL2-26B 38.8%
  9. 9 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 38.1%
  10. 10 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 35.6%
  11. 11 CogVLM-17B-Chat 35.3%
  12. 12 Cambrian-1-34B 35.1%
  13. 13 MiniCPM-V-2_6 33.7%
  14. 14 InternVL2-2B 29%
  15. 15 InternVL2-8B 28.6%
  16. 16 InternVL2-1B 26.1%
  17. 17 InternLM-XComposer2 26%
  18. 18 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 25.7%
  19. 19 InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B 25.1%
  20. 20 Ovis1.5-Gemma2-9B 24.6%
  21. 21 Ovis1.5-Llama3-8B 24.2%
  22. 22 Monkey-Chat 23.1%
  23. 23 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 22.4%
  24. 24 InternVL2-4B 22.1%
  25. 25 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 21.2%
  26. 26 Qwen-VL-Chat 21.1%
  27. 27 llama3-llava-next-8b 19.7%
  28. 28 360VL-70B 19.2%
  29. 29 OmniLMM-12B 19%
  30. 30 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 18.3%
  31. 31 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 18.1%
  32. 32 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 18.1%
  33. 33 DeepSeek-VL-1.3B-Chat 17.4%
  34. 34 llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b 16.7%
  35. 35 PaliGemma-3B-mix-448 16.3%
  36. 36 LLaVA-Next-Qwen-32B 13.2%
  37. 37 InternLM-XComposer2-4KHD-7B 12.9%
  38. 38 LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B 12.4%
  39. 39 LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B-DPO 11.8%
  40. 40 llava-v1.5-7b 10.4%
  41. 41 MiniCPM-V 6.40%
  42. 42 Mantis-8B-Idefics2 6.00%
  43. 43 Mantis-8B-Fuyu 5.10%
  44. 44 Yi-VL-34B 4.80%
  45. 45 Mantis-8B-siglip-llama3 4.80%
  46. 46 Yi-VL-6B 4.70%
  47. 47 Chameleon-7B 3.30%
  48. 48 Chameleon-30B 0.30%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 75.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 61.3% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o May 2024 51.8% detail-low May 2024 Official leaderboard
4 GLM-4V-9B 49.8% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL2-Llama3-76B 48.3% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL2-40B 47.5% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o mini 42% detail-high Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL2-26B 38.8% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 38.1% May 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 35.6% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
11 CogVLM-17B-Chat 35.3% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
12 Cambrian-1-34B 35.1% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
13 MiniCPM-V-2_6 33.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
14 InternVL2-2B 29% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
15 InternVL2-8B 28.6% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
16 InternVL2-1B 26.1% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
17 InternLM-XComposer2 26% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
18 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 25.7% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
19 InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B 25.1% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Ovis1.5-Gemma2-9B 24.6% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Ovis1.5-Llama3-8B 24.2% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
22 Monkey-Chat 23.1% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
23 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 22.4% May 2024 Official leaderboard
24 InternVL2-4B 22.1% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
25 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 21.2% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen-VL-Chat 21.1% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
27 llama3-llava-next-8b 19.7% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
28 360VL-70B 19.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
29 OmniLMM-12B 19% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
30 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 18.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
31 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 18.1% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
32 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 18.1% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
33 DeepSeek-VL-1.3B-Chat 17.4% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
34 llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b 16.7% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
35 PaliGemma-3B-mix-448 16.3% May 2024 Official leaderboard
36 LLaVA-Next-Qwen-32B 13.2% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
37 InternLM-XComposer2-4KHD-7B 12.9% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
38 LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B 12.4% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
39 LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B-DPO 11.8% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
40 llava-v1.5-7b 10.4% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
41 MiniCPM-V 6.40% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
42 Mantis-8B-Idefics2 6.00% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
43 Mantis-8B-Fuyu 5.10% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
44 Yi-VL-34B 4.80% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
45 Mantis-8B-siglip-llama3 4.80% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
46 Yi-VL-6B 4.70% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
47 Chameleon-7B 3.30% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
48 Chameleon-30B 0.30% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Other labs Qwen Shanghai AI Lab
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2024
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2025, by InternVL3.5-241B-A28B

The best score passed 85% in Aug 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Qwen2.5-VL-72B Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct GPT-4o CogVLM-17B-Chat Qwen-VL-Chat 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Qwen2.5-VL-72B

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 71.8 VCR-EN-Easy EM 71.8, Jaccard 80.0, reasoning off only (Table 3) Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 97 VCR-EN-Easy EM (Table 4). Jaccard 99.0 Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 79.8 VCR En-Hard-EM (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%