VCR (Visual Caption Restoration)
Models restore caption text that is partly covered in an image, using only the visible pixel fragments. Scored by exact match and Jaccard similarity of the words.
English and Chinese splits in easy and hard settings. Not the older Visual Commonsense Reasoning dataset with the same short name. OpenVLM lists it for 56 models.
In the authors’ words
We introduce Visual Caption Restoration (VCR), a novel vision-language task that challenges models to accurately restore partially obscured texts using pixel-level hints within images. This task stems from the observation that text embedded in images is intrinsically different from common visual elements and natural language due to the need to align the modalities of vision, text, and text embedded in images. While numerous works have integrated text embedded in images into visual question-answering tasks, approaches to these tasks generally rely on optical character recognition or masked language modeling, thus reducing the task to mainly text-based processing. However, text-based processing becomes ineffective in VCR as accurate text restoration depends on the combined information from provided images, context, and subtle cues from the tiny exposed areas of masked texts. We develop a pipeline to generate synthetic images for the VCR task using image-caption pairs, with adjustable caption visibility to control the task difficulty. With this pipeline, we construct a dataset for VCR called VCR-Wiki using images with captions from Wikipedia, comprising 2.11M English and 346K Chinese entities in both easy and hard split variants. Our results reveal that current vision language models significantly lag behind human performance in the VCR task, and merely fine-tuning the models on our dataset does not lead to notable improvements. We release VCR-Wiki and the data construction code to facilitate future research.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct leads with 75.6% among models released by Aug 2024
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 75.6 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 61.3
Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct
- 51.8 GPT-4o
- 49.8 GLM-4V-9B
- 48.3
InternVL2-Llama3-76B
- 47.5
InternVL2-40B
- 42.0 GPT-4o mini
- 38.8
InternVL2-26B
- 38.1
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 35.6 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 35.3 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 35.1
Cambrian-1-34B
- 33.7 MiniCPM-V-2_6
- 29.0
InternVL2-2B
- 28.6
InternVL2-8B
- 26.1
InternVL2-1B
- 26.0 InternLM-XComposer2
- 25.7 InternVL-Chat-V1-5
- 25.1
InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B
- 24.6
Ovis1.5-Gemma2-9B
- 24.2
Ovis1.5-Llama3-8B
- 23.1 Monkey-Chat
- 22.4
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5
- 22.1
InternVL2-4B
- 21.2
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
- 21.1 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 19.7 llama3-llava-next-8b
- 19.2 360VL-70B
- 19.0
OmniLMM-12B
- 18.3 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b
- 18.1 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b
- 18.1 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 17.4
DeepSeek-VL-1.3B-Chat
- 16.7 llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b
- 16.3
PaliGemma-3B-mix-448
- 13.2 LLaVA-Next-Qwen-32B
- 12.9
InternLM-XComposer2-4KHD-7B
- 12.4
LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B
- 11.8
LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B-DPO
- 10.4 llava-v1.5-7b
- 6.40
MiniCPM-V
- 6.00 Mantis-8B-Idefics2
- 5.10 Mantis-8B-Fuyu
- 4.80
Yi-VL-34B
- 4.80 Mantis-8B-siglip-llama3
- 4.70
Yi-VL-6B
- 3.30
Chameleon-7B
- 0.30
Chameleon-30B
- 1 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 75.6%
- 2
Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 61.3%
- 3 GPT-4o May 2024, detail-low 51.8%
- 4 GLM-4V-9B 49.8%
- 5
InternVL2-Llama3-76B 48.3%
- 6
InternVL2-40B 47.5%
- 7 GPT-4o mini detail-high 42%
- 8
InternVL2-26B 38.8%
- 9
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 38.1%
- 10 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 35.6%
- 11 CogVLM-17B-Chat 35.3%
- 12
Cambrian-1-34B 35.1%
- 13 MiniCPM-V-2_6 33.7%
- 14
InternVL2-2B 29%
- 15
InternVL2-8B 28.6%
- 16
InternVL2-1B 26.1%
- 17 InternLM-XComposer2 26%
- 18 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 25.7%
- 19
InternLM-XComposer2.5-7B 25.1%
- 20
Ovis1.5-Gemma2-9B 24.6%
- 21
Ovis1.5-Llama3-8B 24.2%
- 22 Monkey-Chat 23.1%
- 23
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 22.4%
- 24
InternVL2-4B 22.1%
- 25
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 21.2%
- 26 Qwen-VL-Chat 21.1%
- 27 llama3-llava-next-8b 19.7%
- 28 360VL-70B 19.2%
- 29
OmniLMM-12B 19%
- 30 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 18.3%
- 31 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 18.1%
- 32 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 18.1%
- 33
DeepSeek-VL-1.3B-Chat 17.4%
- 34 llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b 16.7%
- 35
PaliGemma-3B-mix-448 16.3%
- 36 LLaVA-Next-Qwen-32B 13.2%
- 37
InternLM-XComposer2-4KHD-7B 12.9%
- 38
LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B 12.4%
- 39
LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave-7B-DPO 11.8%
- 40 llava-v1.5-7b 10.4%
- 41
MiniCPM-V 6.40%
- 42 Mantis-8B-Idefics2 6.00%
- 43 Mantis-8B-Fuyu 5.10%
- 44
Yi-VL-34B 4.80%
- 45 Mantis-8B-siglip-llama3 4.80%
- 46
Yi-VL-6B 4.70%
- 47
Chameleon-7B 3.30%
- 48
Chameleon-30B 0.30%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 75.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 61.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 51.8% | detail-low | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GLM-4V-9B | 49.8% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 48.3% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 47.5% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-4o mini | 42% | detail-high | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 38.8% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 38.1% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 35.6% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 35.3% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 35.1% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 33.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 29% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 28.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 26.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | InternLM-XComposer2 | 26% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | InternVL-Chat-V1-5 | 25.7% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 25.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 24.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 24.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Monkey-Chat | 23.1% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 22.4% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 22.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 21.2% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 21.1% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | llama3-llava-next-8b | 19.7% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | 360VL-70B | 19.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 19% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | llava-v1.6-mistral-7b | 18.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b | 18.1% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 18.1% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 17.4% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | llava-v1.6-vicuna-7b | 16.7% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 16.3% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | LLaVA-Next-Qwen-32B | 13.2% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 12.9% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 12.4% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 11.8% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | llava-v1.5-7b | 10.4% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 6.40% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Mantis-8B-Idefics2 | 6.00% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | Mantis-8B-Fuyu | 5.10% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 4.80% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | Mantis-8B-siglip-llama3 | 4.80% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 4.70% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 3.30% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 0.30% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Aug 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
3 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 71.8 | VCR-EN-Easy EM 71.8, Jaccard 80.0, reasoning off only (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 97 | VCR-EN-Easy EM (Table 4). Jaccard 99.0 | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 79.8 | VCR En-Hard-EM (Table 5) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%