V*
Models answer 191 multiple choice questions about small details in high-resolution images, such as an object's color or relative position.
Some model cards report runs with Python image tools, which are not comparable with plain runs.
In the authors’ words
When we look around and perform complex tasks, how we see and selectively process what we see is crucial. However, the lack of this visual search mechanism in current multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) hinders their ability to focus on important visual details, especially when handling high-resolution and visually crowded images. To address this, we introduce V*, an LLM-guided visual search mechanism that employs the world knowledge in LLMs for efficient visual querying. When combined with an MLLM, this mechanism enhances collaborative reasoning, contextual understanding, and precise targeting of specific visual elements. This integration results in a new MLLM meta-architecture, named Show, sEArch, and TelL (SEAL). We further create V*Bench, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MLLMs in their ability to process high-resolution images and focus on visual details. Our study highlights the necessity of incorporating visual search capabilities into multimodal systems. The code is available https://github.com/penghao-wu/vstar.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
2 models share the top score of 96.9%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1
Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9%
- 2 Kimi K2.6 96.9%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8%
- 4
Step 3.7 Flash 95.3%
- 5
Qwen3.6 27B 94.7%
- 6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2%
- 7
Seed1.5-VL 89%
- 8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9%
- 9
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6%
- 10 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2%
- 11
STEP3-VL-10B 82.8%
- 12
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 96.9% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K2.6 | 96.9% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 95.8% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 95.3% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 94.7% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 93.2% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 89% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 85.9% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 85.6% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 83.2% | Jun 2025 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 82.8% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 71.7% | May 2024 | Model card |
4 models have held number one since its release in Dec 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in May 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Oct 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 85.6 | V* | |
| 29 May 2026 | 95.3 | V* (with Python) | |
| 22 Apr 2026 | 94.7 | V* | |
| 20 Apr 2026 | Kimi K2.6 | 96.9 | V* (w/ python) |
| 2 Apr 2026 | 96.9 | V* (96.9 / 90.5) | |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 93.2 | V* 93.2 / 90.1 (with CI / without CI) | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 95.8 | V* (95.8/91.1) | |
| 21 Jun 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 | 83.2 | V* Benchmark (without extra tools) |
| 12 May 2025 | 89 | V* | |
| 14 May 2024 | 71.7 | V* bench (test), 0-shot |
5 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | | 85.6 | V*, static multiple choice without a visual search tool (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 14 Jan 2026 | | 82.8 | V*, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 84.29 | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 85.9 | V*, no tool (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jun 2025 | Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report | 83.2 | V* Benchmark, without external tools (Abstract, section 4.3) | Capabilities |
| 11 May 2025 | | 89 | V*, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 89.5 | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%