Benchmark Almanac

V*

Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9% leads since Apr 2026 Fading

Models answer 191 multiple choice questions about small details in high-resolution images, such as an object's color or relative position.

Some model cards report runs with Python image tools, which are not comparable with plain runs.

In the authors’ words

When we look around and perform complex tasks, how we see and selectively process what we see is crucial. However, the lack of this visual search mechanism in current multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) hinders their ability to focus on important visual details, especially when handling high-resolution and visually crowded images. To address this, we introduce V*, an LLM-guided visual search mechanism that employs the world knowledge in LLMs for efficient visual querying. When combined with an MLLM, this mechanism enhances collaborative reasoning, contextual understanding, and precise targeting of specific visual elements. This integration results in a new MLLM meta-architecture, named Show, sEArch, and TelL (SEAL). We further create V*Bench, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MLLMs in their ability to process high-resolution images and focus on visual details. Our study highlights the necessity of incorporating visual search capabilities into multimodal systems. The code is available https://github.com/penghao-wu/vstar.

Abstract of V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs (arXiv:2312.14135, CC0)
Made by Penghao Wu and Saining Xie Released Dec 2023 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
12
Models scored in lab cards
10
Launch posts list it, from 6 labs
5
System cards report it, from 5 labs

2 models share the top score of 96.9%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9%
  2. 2 Kimi K2.6 96.9%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8%
  4. 4 Step 3.7 Flash 95.3%
  5. 5 Qwen3.6 27B 94.7%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2%
  7. 7 Seed1.5-VL 89%
  8. 8 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9%
  9. 9 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6%
  10. 10 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2%
  11. 11 STEP3-VL-10B 82.8%
  12. 12 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9% Apr 2026 Model card
2 Kimi K2.6 96.9% Apr 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Step 3.7 Flash 95.3% May 2026 Model card
5 Qwen3.6 27B 94.7% Apr 2026 Model card
6 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2% Feb 2026 Model card
7 Seed1.5-VL 89% May 2025 Model card
8 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85.9% Nov 2025 Model card
9 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6% Oct 2026 Model card
10 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2% Jun 2025 Model card
11 STEP3-VL-10B 82.8% Jan 2026 Model card
12 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 71.7% May 2024 Model card

4 models have held number one since its release in Dec 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed Qwen
Lab claims Passed 85% in May 2025, by Seed1.5-VL

The best score passed 85% in May 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.6 Plus Seed1.5-VL Gemini 1.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.6 Plus Seed1.5-VL

Labs headline it less often now, last in Oct 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
ByteDance Seed
Moonshot AI
Qwen
StepFun
NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 85.6 V*
29 May 2026 Step 3.7 Flash 95.3 V* (with Python)
22 Apr 2026 Qwen3.6 27B 94.7 V*
20 Apr 2026 Kimi K2.6 96.9 V* (w/ python)
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 96.9 V* (96.9 / 90.5)
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.2 V* 93.2 / 90.1 (with CI / without CI)
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 95.8 V* (95.8/91.1)
21 Jun 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 83.2 V* Benchmark (without extra tools)
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 89 V*
14 May 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 71.7 V* bench (test), 0-shot

5 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 85.6 V*, static multiple choice without a visual search tool (Table 10) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 82.8 V*, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 84.29 Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 85.9 V*, no tool (Table 2) Capabilities
23 Jun 2025 Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 technical report 83.2 V* Benchmark, without external tools (Abstract, section 4.3) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 89 V*, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 89.5 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%