Benchmark Almanac

TallyQA

Amazon Nova Premier 61.5% leads since Apr 2025 Dropped

Models answer open-ended counting questions about images, including complex ones that need object relationships or attributes. Scored by exact count accuracy.

In the authors’ words

Most counting questions in visual question answering (VQA) datasets are simple and require no more than object detection. Here, we study algorithms for complex counting questions that involve relationships between objects, attribute identification, reasoning, and more. To do this, we created TallyQA, the world's largest dataset for open-ended counting. We propose a new algorithm for counting that uses relation networks with region proposals. Our method lets relation networks be efficiently used with high-resolution imagery. It yields state-of-the-art results compared to baseline and recent systems on both TallyQA and the HowMany-QA benchmark.

Abstract of TallyQA: Answering Complex Counting Questions (arXiv:1810.12440, CC0)
Made by Rochester Institute of Technology Released Oct 2018 Spatial reasoning and counting All tasks public Last in a launch post Apr 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Apr 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
4
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Amazon Nova Premier leads with 61.5% among models released by Apr 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Amazon Nova Premier 61.5%
  2. 2 Gemma 3 27B 54.3%
  3. 3 Gemma 3 12B 51.8%
  4. 4 Gemma 3 4B 42.5%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Amazon Nova Premier 61.5% Apr 2025 Model card
2 Gemma 3 27B 54.3% Mar 2025 Model card
3 Gemma 3 12B 51.8% Mar 2025 Model card
4 Gemma 3 4B 42.5% Mar 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind Amazon
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Amazon Nova Premier Gemma 3 27B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Amazon Nova Premier Gemma 3 27B

No launch post has listed it since Apr 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Amazon
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
30 Apr 2025 Amazon Nova Premier 61.5 TallyQA
12 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B 54.3 TallyQA (PT)

4 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
30 Apr 2025 Amazon Nova Premier technical report 61.5 TallyQA, balanced setting, +/-9.1 (Table 1) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 42.5 TallyQA, PT, 4-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 54.3 TallyQA, PT, 4-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 51.8 TallyQA, PT, 4-shot (Table 11) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%