Benchmark Almanac

SpatialSense VQA

Gemma 3 12B 60% leads since Mar 2025 Dropped

Models judge whether a stated spatial relation between two objects holds in an image. The relations were crowdsourced to defeat simple cues.

Gemma 3 reports a VQA-style version for pretrained checkpoints, not the original classification setup.

In the authors’ words

Understanding the spatial relations between objects in images is a surprisingly challenging task. A chair may be "behind" a person even if it appears to the left of the person in the image (depending on which way the person is facing). Two students that appear close to each other in the image may not in fact be "next to" each other if there is a third student between them. We introduce SpatialSense, a dataset specializing in spatial relation recognition which captures a broad spectrum of such challenges, allowing for proper benchmarking of computer vision techniques. SpatialSense is constructed through adversarial crowdsourcing, in which human annotators are tasked with finding spatial relations that are difficult to predict using simple cues such as 2D spatial configuration or language priors. Adversarial crowdsourcing significantly reduces dataset bias and samples more interesting relations in the long tail compared to existing datasets. On SpatialSense, state-of-the-art recognition models perform comparably to simple baselines, suggesting that they rely on straightforward cues instead of fully reasoning about this complex task. The SpatialSense benchmark provides a path forward to advancing the spatial reasoning capabilities of computer vision systems. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/princeton-vl/SpatialSense.

Abstract of SpatialSense: An Adversarially Crowdsourced Benchmark for Spatial Relation Recognition (arXiv:1908.02660, CC0)
Made by Princeton Vision and Learning Lab (Kaiyu Yang , Olga Russakovsky , Jia Deng) Released Aug 2019 Spatial reasoning and counting All tasks public Last in a launch post Mar 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Mar 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
3
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemma 3 12B leads with 60% among models released by Mar 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemma 3 12B 60%
  2. 2 Gemma 3 27B 59.4%
  3. 3 Gemma 3 4B 50.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemma 3 12B 60% Mar 2025 Model card
2 Gemma 3 27B 59.4% Mar 2025 Model card
3 Gemma 3 4B 50.9% Mar 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 3 12B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 3 12B

No launch post has listed it since Mar 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B 59.4 SpatialSense VQA (PT)

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 50.9 SpatialSense VQA, PT, 4-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 59.4 SpatialSense VQA, PT, 4-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 60 SpatialSense VQA, PT, 4-shot (Table 11) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%