Benchmark Almanac

SITE

Models answer multiple-choice spatial questions over single images, multiple images and video, drawn from about 30 vision datasets. Tasks span figural to environmental scale.

Accepted at ICCV 2025. Some later papers report a chance-adjusted accuracy.

In the authors’ words

Spatial intelligence (SI) represents a cognitive ability encompassing the visualization, manipulation, and reasoning about spatial relationships, underpinning disciplines from neuroscience to robotics. We introduce SITE, a benchmark dataset towards SI Thorough Evaluation in a standardized format of multi-choice visual question-answering, designed to assess large vision-language models' spatial intelligence across diverse visual modalities (single-image, multi-image, and video) and SI factors (figural to environmental scales, spatial visualization and orientation, intrinsic and extrinsic, static and dynamic). Our approach to curating the benchmark combines a bottom-up survey about 31 existing datasets and a top-down strategy drawing upon three classification systems in cognitive science, which prompt us to design two novel types of tasks about view-taking and dynamic scenes. Extensive experiments reveal that leading models fall behind human experts especially in spatial orientation, a fundamental SI factor. Moreover, we demonstrate a positive correlation between a model's spatial reasoning proficiency and its performance on an embodied AI task.

Abstract of SITE: towards Spatial Intelligence Thorough Evaluation (arXiv:2505.05456, CC0)
Made by Boston University and Microsoft Research Released May 2025 Spatial reasoning and counting All tasks public Last in a launch post Jan 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jan 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B leads with 47.5%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 47.5%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 47.5% Jan 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jan 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

SenseTime
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
8 Jan 2026 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 47.5 SITE

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%