Benchmark Almanac

SEED-Bench-2-Plus

Qwen2.5-VL-72B 73% leads since Feb 2025 Only in system cards

Multimodal models answer multiple-choice questions about text-rich images such as charts, maps and web pages.

A text-rich companion to SEED-Bench-2, not a replacement.

In the authors’ words

Comprehending text-rich visual content is paramount for the practical application of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), since text-rich scenarios are ubiquitous in the real world, which are characterized by the presence of extensive texts embedded within images. Recently, the advent of MLLMs with impressive versatility has raised the bar for what we can expect from MLLMs. However, their proficiency in text-rich scenarios has yet to be comprehensively and objectively assessed, since current MLLM benchmarks primarily focus on evaluating general visual comprehension. In this work, we introduce SEED-Bench-2-Plus, a benchmark specifically designed for evaluating text-rich visual comprehension of MLLMs. Our benchmark comprises 2.3K multiple-choice questions with precise human annotations, spanning three broad categories: Charts, Maps, and Webs, each of which covers a wide spectrum of text-rich scenarios in the real world. These categories, due to their inherent complexity and diversity, effectively simulate real-world text-rich environments. We further conduct a thorough evaluation involving 34 prominent MLLMs (including GPT-4V, Gemini-Pro-Vision and Claude-3-Opus) and emphasize the current limitations of MLLMs in text-rich visual comprehension. We hope that our work can serve as a valuable addition to existing MLLM benchmarks, providing insightful observations and inspiring further research in the area of text-rich visual comprehension with MLLMs. The dataset and evaluation code can be accessed at https://github.com/AILab-CVC/SEED-Bench.

Abstract of SEED-Bench-2-Plus: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models with Text-Rich Visual Comprehension (arXiv:2404.16790, CC0)
Made by Tencent AI Lab (ARC Lab) Released Apr 2024 Documents, charts and text in images All tasks public Last in a system card Nov 2025 Last model added Nov 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Qwen2.5-VL-72B leads with 73% among models released by Oct 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Oct 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 73%
  2. 2 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 71.9%
  3. 3 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 70%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 73% Feb 2025 Model card
2 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 71.9% Aug 2025 Model card
3 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 70% Nov 2025 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Nov 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2.5-VL-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2.5-VL-72B

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 70 SEED-Bench-2-Plus, reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 71.3 Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 71.9 SEED-2-Plus (Table 4) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 73 SEED-Bench-2-Plus (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%