Benchmark Almanac

RoboSpatial-Home

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% Dropped

Models answer 350 spatial questions on home scenes for robots, in three types: object context, compatibility of placements and spatial configuration.

The test set of the RoboSpatial paper (CVPR 2025). Some answers are 2D points, others yes or no.

In the authors’ words

Spatial understanding is a crucial capability that enables robots to perceive their surroundings, reason about their environment, and interact with it meaningfully. In modern robotics, these capabilities are increasingly provided by vision-language models. However, these models face significant challenges in spatial reasoning tasks, as their training data are based on general-purpose image datasets that often lack sophisticated spatial understanding. For example, datasets frequently do not capture reference frame comprehension, yet effective spatial reasoning requires understanding whether to reason from ego-, world-, or object-centric perspectives. To address this issue, we introduce RoboSpatial, a large-scale dataset for spatial understanding in robotics. It consists of real indoor and tabletop scenes, captured as 3D scans and egocentric images, and annotated with rich spatial information relevant to robotics. The dataset includes 1M images, 5k 3D scans, and 3M annotated spatial relationships, and the pairing of 2D egocentric images with 3D scans makes it both 2D- and 3D- ready. Our experiments show that models trained with RoboSpatial outperform baselines on downstream tasks such as spatial affordance prediction, spatial relationship prediction, and robot manipulation.

Abstract of RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Robotics (arXiv:2411.16537, CC0)
Made by NVIDIA and The Ohio State University Released Nov 2024 Spatial reasoning and counting All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Nov 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B leads with 73.9%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9% Sep 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B

No launch post has listed it since Sep 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 73.9 RoboSpatialHome

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 73.9 RoboSpatialHome (Table 2) Capabilities
25 Sep 2025 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview technical report RoboSpatial-Pointing 31.1 and RoboSpatial-VQA 79.3 reported separately, no combined score (Table 19, thinking on) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%