Benchmark Almanac

RBench

WEAVE-0.5 64.2% tops its leaderboard Wan 2.6 60.7% leads the models we track Not in model cards

650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability.

MLLM-judged. GPT and Qwen judges give different scores and orders. Best GPT-judged 0.642. Later rows (e.g. Cosmos 3) were supplied by model authors.

In the authors’ words

Video generation models have significantly advanced embodied intelligence, unlocking new possibilities for generating diverse robot data that capture perception, reasoning, and action in the physical world. However, synthesizing high-quality videos that accurately reflect real-world robotic interactions remains challenging, and the lack of a standardized benchmark limits fair comparisons and progress. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive robotics benchmark, RBench, designed to evaluate robot-oriented video generation across five task domains and four distinct embodiments. It assesses both task-level correctness and visual fidelity through reproducible sub-metrics, including structural consistency, physical plausibility, and action completeness. Evaluation of 25 representative models highlights significant deficiencies in generating physically realistic robot behaviors. Furthermore, the benchmark achieves a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.96 with human evaluations, validating its effectiveness. While RBench provides the necessary lens to identify these deficiencies, achieving physical realism requires moving beyond evaluation to address the critical shortage of high-quality training data. Driven by these insights, we introduce a refined four-stage data pipeline, resulting in RoVid-X, the largest open-source robotic dataset for video generation with 4 million annotated video clips, covering thousands of tasks and enriched with comprehensive physical property annotations. Collectively, this synergistic ecosystem of evaluation and data establishes a robust foundation for rigorous assessment and scalable training of video models, accelerating the evolution of embodied AI toward general intelligence.

Abstract of Rethinking Video Generation Model for the Embodied World (arXiv:2601.15282, CC0)
Made by Peking University DAGroup Released Jan 2026 Video world models All tasks public Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
30
Entries on its own leaderboard, 10 models we track

WEAVE-0.5 tops the leaderboard with 64.2%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Wan 2.6, at 60.7%.

  1. 1 WEAVE-0.5 64.2%
  2. 2 LingBot-Video 62%
  3. 3 Wan 2.6 60.7%
  4. 4 Seedance v1.5 Pro 58.4%
  5. 5 Cosmos3-Nano 58.4%
  6. 6 Cosmos3-Super 58.1%
  7. 7 Wan 2.5 Preview 57%
  8. 8 Hailuo v2 56.5%
  9. 9 Veo 3 56.3%
  10. 10 Cosmos3-edge 55.1%
  11. 11 Seedance 1.0 55.1%
  12. 12 Kling 2.6 Pro 53.4%
  13. 13 Wan 2.2 A14B 50.7%
  14. 14 Cosmos 2.5 46.4%
  15. 15 HunyuanVideo 1.5 46%
  16. 16 LongCat-Video 43.7%
  17. 17 DreamGen(gr1) 42%
  18. 18 DreamGen(droid) 40.5%
  19. 19 Wan2.1_14B 39.9%
  20. 20 LTX-2 19B 38.1%
  21. 21 Wan2.2_5B 38%
  22. 22 Sora 2 Pro 36.2%
  23. 23 SkyReels 36.1%
  24. 24 LTX-Video 34.4%
  25. 25 FramePack 33.9%
  26. 26 HunyuanVideo 30.3%
  27. 27 Sora 26.6%
  28. 28 CogVideoX_5B 25.6%
  29. 29 Vidar 20.6%
  30. 30 UnifoLM-WMA-0 12.3%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 WEAVE-0.5 64.2% Official leaderboard
2 LingBot-Video 62% Official leaderboard
3 Wan 2.6 60.7% Official leaderboard
4 Seedance v1.5 Pro 58.4% Official leaderboard
5 Cosmos3-Nano 58.4% Official leaderboard
6 Cosmos3-Super 58.1% Official leaderboard
7 Wan 2.5 Preview 57% Official leaderboard
8 Hailuo v2 56.5% Official leaderboard
9 Veo 3 56.3% Official leaderboard
10 Cosmos3-edge 55.1% Official leaderboard
11 Seedance 1.0 55.1% Official leaderboard
12 Kling 2.6 Pro 53.4% Official leaderboard
13 Wan 2.2 A14B 50.7% Official leaderboard
14 Cosmos 2.5 46.4% Official leaderboard
15 HunyuanVideo 1.5 46% Official leaderboard
16 LongCat-Video 43.7% Official leaderboard
17 DreamGen(gr1) 42% Official leaderboard
18 DreamGen(droid) 40.5% Official leaderboard
19 Wan2.1_14B 39.9% Official leaderboard
20 LTX-2 19B 38.1% Official leaderboard
21 Wan2.2_5B 38% Official leaderboard
22 Sora 2 Pro 36.2% Official leaderboard
23 SkyReels 36.1% Official leaderboard
24 LTX-Video 34.4% Official leaderboard
25 FramePack 33.9% Official leaderboard
26 HunyuanVideo 30.3% Official leaderboard
27 Sora 26.6% Official leaderboard
28 CogVideoX_5B 25.6% Official leaderboard
29 Vidar 20.6% Official leaderboard
30 UnifoLM-WMA-0 12.3% Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

No dated values yet.

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in World models

All 34 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 56.4
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • MVPBench Dropped Models answer video questions on spatial, temporal and intuitive physics. Each question comes in a pair of near-identical videos with opposite answers, so text or single-frame shortcuts fail. gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 72.5%