Benchmark Almanac

Point-Bench

gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 67.1% leads since Sep 2025 Fading

Models point to the image location a language request describes, in about 1,000 tasks across five reasoning categories. A point inside the target mask counts as correct.

Part of PointArena with the Point-Battle voting arena and the Point-Act robot setup. The mask rule is an assumption from the task design.

In the authors’ words

Pointing serves as a fundamental and intuitive mechanism for grounding language within visual contexts, with applications spanning robotics, assistive technologies, and interactive AI systems. While recent multimodal models have started to support pointing capabilities, existing benchmarks typically focus only on referential object localization tasks. We introduce PointArena, a comprehensive platform for evaluating multimodal pointing across diverse reasoning scenarios. PointArena comprises three components: (1) Point-Bench, a curated dataset containing approximately 1,000 pointing tasks across five reasoning categories; (2) Point-Battle, an interactive, web-based arena facilitating blind, pairwise model comparisons, which has already gathered over 4,500 anonymized votes; and (3) Point-Act, a real-world robotic manipulation system allowing users to directly evaluate multimodal model pointing capabilities in practical settings. We conducted extensive evaluations of both state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary multimodal models. Results indicate that Molmo-72B consistently outperforms other models, though proprietary models increasingly demonstrate comparable performance. Additionally, we find that supervised training specifically targeting pointing tasks significantly enhances model performance. Across our multi-stage evaluation pipeline, we also observe strong correlations, underscoring the critical role of precise pointing capabilities in enabling multimodal models to effectively bridge abstract reasoning with concrete, real-world actions. Project page: https://pointarena.github.io/

Abstract of PointArena: Probing Multimodal Grounding Through Language-Guided Pointing (arXiv:2505.09990, CC0)
Made by Cheng et al. (PointArena team) Released May 2025 Detection and captioning All tasks public Last in a launch post Dec 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Mar 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
17
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview leads with 67.1% among models released by Sep 2025

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 67.1%
  2. 2 Molmo-72B 63.8%
  3. 3 Molmo-7B-O 63.3%
  4. 4 Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 62.8%
  5. 5 Molmo-7B-D 61.6%
  6. 6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 59%
  7. 7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 59%
  8. 8 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 56.3%
  9. 9 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 47%
  10. 10 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 47%
  11. 11 o3 43.5%
  12. 12 GPT-4.1 33.3%
  13. 13 GPT-4o Mar 2025 29.5%
  14. 14 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 22.2%
  15. 15 Grok 2 Vision (1212) 20.5%
  16. 16 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 18%
  17. 17 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 6.32%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 67.1% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Molmo-72B 63.8% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Molmo-7B-O 63.3% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 2.5 Pro May 2025 62.8% May 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Molmo-7B-D 61.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 59% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 59% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 56.3% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 47% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 47% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 o3 43.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-4.1 33.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
13 GPT-4o Mar 2025 29.5% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 22.2% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Grok 2 Vision (1212) 20.5% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
16 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 18% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
17 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 6.32% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

2 models have held number one since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Ai2 Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2025
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
Seed2.0 Pro 81.4%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview Molmo-72B LLaVA-OneVision 72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview

Labs headline it less often now, last in Dec 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 76.5 Point-Bench

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 76.5 Point-Bench (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 81.4 Point-Bench (Table 8) Capabilities
25 Sep 2025 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview technical report 71.6 Point-Bench (Table 19, thinking on). Thinking off 73.3 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%