Benchmark Almanac

PAI-Bench

Cosmos3-Super 83.9% tops its leaderboard Veo 3 82.1% leads the models we track Not in model cards

Physical-AI video generation from 1,044 prompts in six domains, VLM-QA plus quality metrics. Companion control and understanding tracks.

Generation score compressed near the real-video reference (Source 82.6. Cosmos3-Super 83.9 exceeds it). Robot domain spreads more (55-90).

In the authors’ words

Physical AI aims to develop models that can perceive and predict real-world dynamics; yet, the extent to which current multi-modal large language models and video generative models support these abilities is insufficiently understood. We introduce Physical AI Bench (PAI-Bench), a unified and comprehensive benchmark that evaluates perception and prediction capabilities across video generation, conditional video generation, and video understanding, comprising 2,808 real-world cases with task-aligned metrics designed to capture physical plausibility and domain-specific reasoning. Our study provides a systematic assessment of recent models and shows that video generative models, despite strong visual fidelity, often struggle to maintain physically coherent dynamics, while multi-modal large language models exhibit limited performance in forecasting and causal interpretation. These observations suggest that current systems are still at an early stage in handling the perceptual and predictive demands of Physical AI. In summary, PAI-Bench establishes a realistic foundation for evaluating Physical AI and highlights key gaps that future systems must address.

Abstract of PAI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark For Physical AI (arXiv:2512.01989, CC0)
Made by SHI Labs + NVIDIA Released Dec 2025 Video world models All tasks public Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
19
Entries on its own leaderboard, 1 model we track

Cosmos3-Super tops the leaderboard with 83.9%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Veo 3, at 82.1%.

  1. 1 Cosmos3-Super 83.9%
  2. 2 Cosmos3-Nano 83.7%
  3. 3 Veo 3 82.1%
  4. 4 Cosmos3-Edge 81.1%
  5. 5 Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B 81%
  6. 6 Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B 81%
  7. 7 Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 80.6%
  8. 8 Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 80.4%
  9. 9 Cosmos-Predict2-14B-Video2World 80%
  10. 10 Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 79.8%
  11. 11 Cosmos-Predict2-2B-Video2World 79.6%
  12. 12 MAGI-1-24B 78.5%
  13. 13 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V 78.3%
  14. 14 CogVideoX-5b-I2V 77.9%
  15. 15 LTX-Video-13B 77.9%
  16. 16 HunyuanVideo-I2V 77.4%
  17. 17 LTX-Video-2B 76.9%
  18. 18 MAGI-1-4.5B 76.9%
  19. 19 DynamiCrafter_1024 69.7%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Cosmos3-Super 83.9% Official leaderboard
2 Cosmos3-Nano 83.7% Official leaderboard
3 Veo 3 82.1% Official leaderboard
4 Cosmos3-Edge 81.1% Official leaderboard
5 Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B 81% Official leaderboard
6 Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B 81% Official leaderboard
7 Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 80.6% Official leaderboard
8 Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 80.4% Official leaderboard
9 Cosmos-Predict2-14B-Video2World 80% Official leaderboard
10 Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 79.8% Official leaderboard
11 Cosmos-Predict2-2B-Video2World 79.6% Official leaderboard
12 MAGI-1-24B 78.5% Official leaderboard
13 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V 78.3% Official leaderboard
14 CogVideoX-5b-I2V 77.9% Official leaderboard
15 LTX-Video-13B 77.9% Official leaderboard
16 HunyuanVideo-I2V 77.4% Official leaderboard
17 LTX-Video-2B 76.9% Official leaderboard
18 MAGI-1-4.5B 76.9% Official leaderboard
19 DynamiCrafter_1024 69.7% Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

No dated values yet.

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in World models

All 34 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 56.4
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • MVPBench Dropped Models answer video questions on spatial, temporal and intuitive physics. Each question comes in a pair of near-identical videos with opposite answers, so text or single-frame shortcuts fail. gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 72.5%