Benchmark Almanac

OmniAI OCR Benchmark

STEP3-VL-10B 77% Only in system cards

Multimodal models and OCR providers extract text and JSON fields from documents. Accuracy is measured on both plain text and structured extraction.

About 75 likes on Hugging Face.

Made by OmniAI Released Feb 2025 Documents, charts and text in images All tasks public Last in a system card Jan 2026 Last model added Jan 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

STEP3-VL-10B leads with 77%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 STEP3-VL-10B 77%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 STEP3-VL-10B 77% Jan 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) STEP3-VL-10B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) STEP3-VL-10B

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 77 OmniOCR (OmniAI), SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 78.14 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%