Benchmark Almanac

MSEarth

Intern-S1 65.7% leads since Jul 2025 Fading

Models answer questions about figures from Earth science papers across the atmosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and biosphere. Labs report the multiple choice split.

The dataset has more than 289K figures with refined captions. It also has open-ended and captioning splits.

In the authors’ words

The rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offers new opportunities for complex scientific challenges, yet their application in earth science-especially at the graduate level-remains underexplored due to a lack of benchmarks reflecting the depth and complexity of geoscientific reasoning. Existing datasets often rely on synthetic data or simple figure-caption pairs, failing to capture the nuanced reasoning required for real-world applications. To address this, we introduce MSEarth, a multimodal scientific dataset and benchmark curated from high-quality, open-access publications. Covering the five major spheres of Earth science-atmosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere-MSEarth features over 289K figures with refined captions enriched by contextual discussions and reasoning from the original papers. The benchmark supports tasks such as scientific figure captioning, multiple choice questions, and open-ended reasoning, providing a scalable, high-fidelity resource for developing and evaluating MLLMs in scientific reasoning.

Abstract of MSEarth: A Multimodal Benchmark for Earth Science Phenomenon Discovery with MLLMs (arXiv:2505.20740, CC0)
Made by Shanghai AI Lab (Xiangyu Zhao, Lei Bai et al.) Released May 2025 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Feb 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Mar 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Intern-S1 leads with 65.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Intern-S1 65.7%
  2. 2 Intern-S1-Pro 65.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Intern-S1 65.7% Jul 2025 Model card
2 Intern-S1-Pro 65.2% Feb 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Shanghai AI Lab
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
Intern-S1 65.7%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S1

Labs headline it less often now, last in Feb 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
2 Feb 2026 Intern-S1-Pro 65.2 MSEarth-MCQ
24 Jul 2025 Intern-S1 65.7 MSEarthMCQ

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
26 Mar 2026 Intern-S1-Pro technical report 65.2 MSEarth-MCQ, Earth Science, non-thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
21 Aug 2025 Intern-S1 technical report 65.7 MSEarthMCQ (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%