Benchmark Almanac

MMSI-Bench

SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 42.5% leads since Jan 2026 Fading

Models answer 1,000 human-written questions that need spatial reasoning across several images. Images come from indoor scans, driving, egocentric video and robot data.

Tasks cover camera, object and region relations, plus a multi-step reasoning category. arXiv v3 was posted on 2026-05-23.

In the authors’ words

Spatial intelligence is essential for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) operating in the complex physical world. Existing benchmarks, however, probe only single-image relations and thus fail to assess the multi-image spatial reasoning that real-world deployments demand. We introduce MMSI-Bench, a VQA benchmark dedicated to multi-image spatial intelligence. Six 3D-vision researchers spent more than 300 hours meticulously crafting 1,000 challenging, unambiguous multiple-choice questions from over 120,000 images, each paired with carefully designed distractors and a stepwise reasoning process. We conduct extensive experiments and evaluate 37 open-source and proprietary MLLMs, observing a wide gap: the strongest open-source model attains roughly 30% accuracy and OpenAI's GPT-5 reasoning model reaches 40%, while humans score 97%. These results underscore the challenging nature of MMSI-Bench and the substantial headroom for future research. Leveraging the annotated reasoning processes, we also provide an automated error analysis pipeline that diagnoses four dominant failure modes, including (1) grounding errors, (2) overlap-matching and scene-reconstruction errors, (3) situation-transformation reasoning errors, and (4) spatial-logic errors, offering insights for advancing spatial intelligence. Project page: https://runsenxu.com/projects/MMSI_Bench .

Abstract of MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence (arXiv:2505.23764, CC0)
Made by Shanghai AI Lab (OpenRobotLab) and collaborators Released May 2025 Spatial reasoning and counting All tasks public Last in a launch post Jan 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
5
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 2 labs

SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B leads with 42.5% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 42.5%
  2. 2 Seed2.1 Pro 35.9%
  3. 3 Seed2.0 Pro 32.5%
  4. 4 STEP3-VL-10B 32.2%
  5. 5 Seed1.8 25.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 42.5% Jan 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.1 Pro 35.9% Jun 2026 Model card
3 Seed2.0 Pro 32.5% Feb 2026 Model card
4 STEP3-VL-10B 32.2% Jan 2026 Model card
5 Seed1.8 25.8% Dec 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed SenseTime
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B Seed1.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B Seed1.8

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jan 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
SenseTime
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
8 Jan 2026 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 42.5 MMSI
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 25.8 MMSIBench (circular)

4 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 35.9 MMSIBench (circular) (Table 9) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 25.8 MMSIBench (circular) (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 32.5 MMSIBench (circular) (Table 8) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 32.2 MMSI-Bench, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 36.40 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%