MMSI-Bench
Models answer 1,000 human-written questions that need spatial reasoning across several images. Images come from indoor scans, driving, egocentric video and robot data.
Tasks cover camera, object and region relations, plus a multi-step reasoning category. arXiv v3 was posted on 2026-05-23.
In the authors’ words
Spatial intelligence is essential for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) operating in the complex physical world. Existing benchmarks, however, probe only single-image relations and thus fail to assess the multi-image spatial reasoning that real-world deployments demand. We introduce MMSI-Bench, a VQA benchmark dedicated to multi-image spatial intelligence. Six 3D-vision researchers spent more than 300 hours meticulously crafting 1,000 challenging, unambiguous multiple-choice questions from over 120,000 images, each paired with carefully designed distractors and a stepwise reasoning process. We conduct extensive experiments and evaluate 37 open-source and proprietary MLLMs, observing a wide gap: the strongest open-source model attains roughly 30% accuracy and OpenAI's GPT-5 reasoning model reaches 40%, while humans score 97%. These results underscore the challenging nature of MMSI-Bench and the substantial headroom for future research. Leveraging the annotated reasoning processes, we also provide an automated error analysis pipeline that diagnoses four dominant failure modes, including (1) grounding errors, (2) overlap-matching and scene-reconstruction errors, (3) situation-transformation reasoning errors, and (4) spatial-logic errors, offering insights for advancing spatial intelligence. Project page: https://runsenxu.com/projects/MMSI_Bench .
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B leads with 42.5% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 42.5%
- 2
Seed2.1 Pro 35.9%
- 3
Seed2.0 Pro 32.5%
- 4
STEP3-VL-10B 32.2%
- 5
Seed1.8 25.8%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 42.5% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 35.9% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 32.5% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 32.2% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 25.8% | Dec 2025 | Model card |
2 models have held number one since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Jan 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Jan 2026 | 42.5 | MMSI | |
| 18 Dec 2025 | 25.8 | MMSIBench (circular) |
4 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 35.9 | MMSIBench (circular) (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 21 Mar 2026 | | 25.8 | MMSIBench (circular) (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 32.5 | MMSIBench (circular) (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 14 Jan 2026 | | 32.2 | MMSI-Bench, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 36.40 | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%