Benchmark Almanac

MME

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 2525.9 leads since Aug 2025 Fading

Models answer yes or no questions about images across 14 perception and cognition subtasks with hand-written instructions. Labs usually report the perception sum, out of 2000.

Scores are sums of subtask scores, not percentages. The perception part has a maximum of 2000 points and cognition 800.

In the authors’ words

Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) relies on the powerful LLM to perform multimodal tasks, showing amazing emergent abilities in recent studies, such as writing poems based on an image. However, it is difficult for these case studies to fully reflect the performance of MLLM, lacking a comprehensive evaluation. In this paper, we fill in this blank, presenting the first comprehensive MLLM Evaluation benchmark MME. It measures both perception and cognition abilities on a total of 14 subtasks. In order to avoid data leakage that may arise from direct use of public datasets for evaluation, the annotations of instruction-answer pairs are all manually designed. The concise instruction design allows us to fairly compare MLLMs, instead of struggling in prompt engineering. Besides, with such an instruction, we can also easily carry out quantitative statistics. A total of 30 advanced MLLMs are comprehensively evaluated on our MME, which not only suggests that existing MLLMs still have a large room for improvement, but also reveals the potential directions for the subsequent model optimization. The data are released at the project page https://github.com/BradyFU/Awesome-Multimodal-Large-Language-Models/tree/Evaluation.

Abstract of MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models (arXiv:2306.13394, CC0)
Made by Fu et al. (Tencent Youtu Lab and Xiamen University) Released Jun 2023 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Aug 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
6
Models scored in lab cards
5
Launch posts list it, from 4 labs
6
System cards report it, from 5 labs

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 2525.9 among models released by Aug 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 2525.9
  2. 2 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 2448.0
  3. 3 BAGEL-7B-MoT 2388.0
  4. 4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 2340.0
  5. 5 LFM2-VL-1.6B 1757.0
  6. 6 Janus-Pro-7B 1567.1
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 2525.9 Aug 2025 Model card
2 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 2448.0 Feb 2025 Model card
3 BAGEL-7B-MoT 2388.0 May 2025 Model card
4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 2340.0 Mar 2025 Model card
5 LFM2-VL-1.6B 1757.0 Nov 2025 Model card
6 Janus-Pro-7B 1567.1 Jan 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 58 entries, 16 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

5 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Other labs Google DeepMind Z.ai Huazhong University of Science and Technology DeepSeek Qwen Shanghai AI Lab
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2024
Qwen-VL-Max 1790.0
Lab claims Not tested since Nov 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 2024 2025 2026 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 2024 2025 2026

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
Qwen
ByteDance Seed
Liquid AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 Aug 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 73.1 MME (normalized)
12 Aug 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B 1753 MME
20 May 2025 BAGEL-7B-MoT 2388 MME (sum)
27 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 2340 MMEsum
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B 1567.1 MME-P

6 system cards report it, from 5 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
28 Nov 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report 1757 MME 1,757, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 2525.9 MME (sum) (Table 6) Capabilities
20 May 2025 BAGEL-7B-MoT technical report 2388 MME-S, the sum of MME-P and MME-C (Table 4). MME-P 1687 Capabilities
26 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 2340 MME sum (Table 5) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 2448 MME sum (Table 3) Capabilities
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B technical report 1567.1 MME-P, sum out of 2000 (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%