MME
Models answer yes or no questions about images across 14 perception and cognition subtasks with hand-written instructions. Labs usually report the perception sum, out of 2000.
Scores are sums of subtask scores, not percentages. The perception part has a maximum of 2000 points and cognition 800.
In the authors’ words
Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) relies on the powerful LLM to perform multimodal tasks, showing amazing emergent abilities in recent studies, such as writing poems based on an image. However, it is difficult for these case studies to fully reflect the performance of MLLM, lacking a comprehensive evaluation. In this paper, we fill in this blank, presenting the first comprehensive MLLM Evaluation benchmark MME. It measures both perception and cognition abilities on a total of 14 subtasks. In order to avoid data leakage that may arise from direct use of public datasets for evaluation, the annotations of instruction-answer pairs are all manually designed. The concise instruction design allows us to fairly compare MLLMs, instead of struggling in prompt engineering. Besides, with such an instruction, we can also easily carry out quantitative statistics. A total of 30 advanced MLLMs are comprehensively evaluated on our MME, which not only suggests that existing MLLMs still have a large room for improvement, but also reveals the potential directions for the subsequent model optimization. The data are released at the project page https://github.com/BradyFU/Awesome-Multimodal-Large-Language-Models/tree/Evaluation.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 2525.9 among models released by Aug 2025
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 2525.9
- 2
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 2448.0
- 3
BAGEL-7B-MoT 2388.0
- 4
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 2340.0
- 5 LFM2-VL-1.6B 1757.0
- 6
Janus-Pro-7B 1567.1
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 2525.9 | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 2448.0 | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 2388.0 | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 2340.0 | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 1757.0 | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 1567.1 | Jan 2025 | Model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 58 entries, 16 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.
5 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 73.1 | MME (normalized) |
| 12 Aug 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B | 1753 | MME |
| 20 May 2025 | 2388 | MME (sum) | |
| 27 Mar 2025 | 2340 | MMEsum | |
| 27 Jan 2025 | 1567.1 | MME-P |
6 system cards report it, from 5 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Nov 2025 | LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report | 1757 | MME 1,757, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 2525.9 | MME (sum) (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 20 May 2025 | | 2388 | MME-S, the sum of MME-P and MME-C (Table 4). MME-P 1687 | Capabilities |
| 26 Mar 2025 | | 2340 | MME sum (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 2448 | MME sum (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 27 Jan 2025 | | 1567.1 | MME-P, sum out of 2000 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%