Benchmark Almanac

MME-RealWorld

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 65.1% leads since Aug 2025 Dropped

Models answer human-annotated multiple choice questions about high-resolution real-world images in scenarios such as remote sensing, autonomous driving, monitoring and OCR.

It has English and Chinese versions.

In the authors’ words

Comprehensive evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has recently garnered widespread attention in the research community. However, we observe that existing benchmarks present several common barriers that make it difficult to measure the significant challenges that models face in the real world, including: 1) small data scale leads to a large performance variance; 2) reliance on model-based annotations results in restricted data quality; 3) insufficient task difficulty, especially caused by the limited image resolution. To tackle these issues, we introduce MME-RealWorld. Specifically, we collect more than 300K images from public datasets and the Internet, filtering 13,366 high-quality images for annotation. This involves the efforts of professional 25 annotators and 7 experts in MLLMs, contributing to 29,429 question-answer pairs that cover 43 subtasks across 5 real-world scenarios, extremely challenging even for humans. As far as we know, MME-RealWorld is the largest manually annotated benchmark to date, featuring the highest resolution and a targeted focus on real-world applications. We further conduct a thorough evaluation involving 28 prominent MLLMs, such as GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Our results show that even the most advanced models struggle with our benchmarks, where none of them reach 60% accuracy. The challenges of perceiving high-resolution images and understanding complex real-world scenarios remain urgent issues to be addressed. The data and evaluation code are released at https://mme-realworld.github.io/ .

Abstract of MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans? (arXiv:2408.13257, CC0)
Made by MME team (Yi-Fan Zhang, Chaoyou Fu et al.) Released Aug 2024 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Nov 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
4
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
4
System cards report it, from 3 labs

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 65.1% among models released by Oct 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Oct 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 65.1%
  2. 2 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 63.2%
  3. 3 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 62.2%
  4. 4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 61.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 65.1% Aug 2025 Model card
2 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 63.2% Feb 2025 Model card
3 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 62.2% Nov 2025 Model card
4 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 61.6% Mar 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen Shanghai AI Lab
Lab claims Not tested since Nov 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B Qwen2.5-VL-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B

No launch post has listed it since Aug 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 65.1 MME-RealWorld (en)
27 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 61.6 MME-RealWorlden

4 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 62.2 MME-RealWorld (EN), reasoning off only (Table 3) Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 65.1 MME-RealWorld (en) (Table 2, Table 5) Capabilities
26 Mar 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 61.6 MME-RealWorld en (Table 5) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 63.2 MME-RealWorld en (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%