Benchmark Almanac

MEGA-Bench

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 54.3% leads since Oct 2024 Only in system cards

Models solve 505 real-world multimodal tasks with over 8,000 samples. Outputs include numbers, code, LaTeX, coordinates and JSON, scored by more than 40 task metrics.

ICLR 2025. Sixteen expert annotators wrote the tasks. Some tasks use a model judge for free-form answers.

In the authors’ words

We present MEGA-Bench, an evaluation suite that scales multimodal evaluation to over 500 real-world tasks, to address the highly heterogeneous daily use cases of end users. Our objective is to optimize for a set of high-quality data samples that cover a highly diverse and rich set of multimodal tasks, while enabling cost-effective and accurate model evaluation. In particular, we collected 505 realistic tasks encompassing over 8,000 samples from 16 expert annotators to extensively cover the multimodal task space. Instead of unifying these problems into standard multi-choice questions (like MMMU, MMBench, and MMT-Bench), we embrace a wide range of output formats like numbers, phrases, code, LaTeX, coordinates, JSON, free-form, etc. To accommodate these formats, we developed over 40 metrics to evaluate these tasks. Unlike existing benchmarks, MEGA-Bench offers a fine-grained capability report across multiple dimensions (e.g., application, input type, output format, skill), allowing users to interact with and visualize model capabilities in depth. We evaluate a wide variety of frontier vision-language models on MEGA-Bench to understand their capabilities across these dimensions.

Abstract of MEGA-Bench: Scaling Multimodal Evaluation to over 500 Real-World Tasks (arXiv:2410.10563, CC0)
Made by TIGER-Lab (University of Waterloo) and others Released Oct 2024 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a system card Feb 2025 Last model added Feb 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
23
Entries on its own leaderboard, 22 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) leads with 54.3% among models released by Oct 2024

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Oct 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 54.3%
  2. 2 GPT-4o May 2024 54.2%
  3. 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 52.1%
  4. 4 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 49.6%
  5. 5 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 47.7%
  6. 6 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.8%
  7. 7 GPT-4o mini 43.1%
  8. 8 InternVL2-Llama3-76B 37.7%
  9. 9 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 36%
  10. 10 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 33.8%
  11. 11 Pixtral 12B 33.7%
  12. 12 Aria 33.1%
  13. 13 Mammoth_VL 27.9%
  14. 14 InternVL2-8B 27.7%
  15. 15 NVLM-D-72B 25.6%
  16. 16 MiniCPM-V-2_6 25.4%
  17. 17 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 25.4%
  18. 18 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 23.9%
  19. 19 Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 22.3%
  20. 20 Llama 3.2 11B 18%
  21. 21 Aquila-VL-2B 17.4%
  22. 22 InternVL2-2B 14.5%
  23. 23 Idefics3-8B-Llama3 13.8%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 54.3% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o May 2024 54.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 52.1% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 49.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 47.7% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o mini 43.1% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL2-Llama3-76B 37.7% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 36% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
10 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 33.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Pixtral 12B 33.7% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Aria 33.1% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Mammoth_VL 27.9% Official leaderboard
14 InternVL2-8B 27.7% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
15 NVLM-D-72B 25.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
16 MiniCPM-V-2_6 25.4% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 25.4% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
18 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 23.9% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 22.3% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Llama 3.2 11B 18% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Aquila-VL-2B 17.4% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
22 InternVL2-2B 14.5% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Idefics3-8B-Llama3 13.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

2 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2024

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) GPT-4o 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 51.3 MegaBench (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%