MEGA-Bench
Models solve 505 real-world multimodal tasks with over 8,000 samples. Outputs include numbers, code, LaTeX, coordinates and JSON, scored by more than 40 task metrics.
ICLR 2025. Sixteen expert annotators wrote the tasks. Some tasks use a model judge for free-form answers.
In the authors’ words
We present MEGA-Bench, an evaluation suite that scales multimodal evaluation to over 500 real-world tasks, to address the highly heterogeneous daily use cases of end users. Our objective is to optimize for a set of high-quality data samples that cover a highly diverse and rich set of multimodal tasks, while enabling cost-effective and accurate model evaluation. In particular, we collected 505 realistic tasks encompassing over 8,000 samples from 16 expert annotators to extensively cover the multimodal task space. Instead of unifying these problems into standard multi-choice questions (like MMMU, MMBench, and MMT-Bench), we embrace a wide range of output formats like numbers, phrases, code, LaTeX, coordinates, JSON, free-form, etc. To accommodate these formats, we developed over 40 metrics to evaluate these tasks. Unlike existing benchmarks, MEGA-Bench offers a fine-grained capability report across multiple dimensions (e.g., application, input type, output format, skill), allowing users to interact with and visualize model capabilities in depth. We evaluate a wide variety of frontier vision-language models on MEGA-Bench to understand their capabilities across these dimensions.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) leads with 54.3% among models released by Oct 2024
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Oct 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 54.3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 54.2 GPT-4o
- 52.1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 49.6
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 47.7 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
- 43.8
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 43.1 GPT-4o mini
- 37.7
InternVL2-Llama3-76B
- 36.0 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 33.8 LLaVA-OneVision 72B
- 33.7
Pixtral 12B
- 33.1 Aria
- 27.9 Mammoth_VL
- 27.7
InternVL2-8B
- 25.6
NVLM-D-72B
- 25.4 MiniCPM-V-2_6
- 25.4 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 23.9
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 22.3
Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct
- 18.0
Llama 3.2 11B
- 17.4 Aquila-VL-2B
- 14.5
InternVL2-2B
- 13.8
Idefics3-8B-Llama3
- 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 54.3%
- 2 GPT-4o May 2024 54.2%
- 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 52.1%
- 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 49.6%
- 5 Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct 47.7%
- 6
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 43.8%
- 7 GPT-4o mini 43.1%
- 8
InternVL2-Llama3-76B 37.7%
- 9 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 36%
- 10 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 33.8%
- 11
Pixtral 12B 33.7%
- 12 Aria 33.1%
- 13 Mammoth_VL 27.9%
- 14
InternVL2-8B 27.7%
- 15
NVLM-D-72B 25.6%
- 16 MiniCPM-V-2_6 25.4%
- 17 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 25.4%
- 18
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 23.9%
- 19
Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 22.3%
- 20
Llama 3.2 11B 18%
- 21 Aquila-VL-2B 17.4%
- 22
InternVL2-2B 14.5%
- 23
Idefics3-8B-Llama3 13.8%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 54.3% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 54.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 52.1% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 49.6% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct | 47.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 43.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-4o mini | 43.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 37.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 36% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | LLaVA-OneVision 72B | 33.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 33.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Aria | 33.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Mammoth_VL | 27.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | | 27.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 25.6% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 25.4% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 25.4% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 23.9% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 22.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 18% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Aquila-VL-2B | 17.4% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 14.5% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 13.8% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
2 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 51.3 | MegaBench (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%