Benchmark Almanac

MDPBench

Gemini 3 Pro 86.4 leads since Mar 2026 Not in model cards

Document parsers read 3,400 digital and photographed document images in 17 languages. Public and private splits limit leakage.

On Hugging Face's official benchmark list.

In the authors’ words

We introduce Multilingual Document Parsing Benchmark, the first benchmark for multilingual digital and photographed document parsing. Document parsing has made remarkable strides, yet almost exclusively on clean, digital, well-formatted pages in a handful of dominant languages. No systematic benchmark exists to evaluate how models perform on digital and photographed documents across diverse scripts and low-resource languages. MDPBench comprises 3,400 document images spanning 17 languages, diverse scripts, and varied photographic conditions, with high-quality annotations produced through a rigorous pipeline of expert model labeling, manual correction, and human verification. To ensure fair comparison and prevent data leakage, we maintain separate public and private evaluation splits. Our comprehensive evaluation of both open-source and closed-source models uncovers a striking finding: while closed-source models (notably Gemini3-Pro) prove relatively robust, open-source alternatives suffer dramatic performance collapse, particularly on non-Latin scripts and real-world photographed documents, with an average drop of 17.8% on photographed documents and 14.0% on non-Latin scripts. These results reveal significant performance imbalances across languages and conditions, and point to concrete directions for building more inclusive, deployment-ready parsing systems. Source available at https://github.com/Yuliang-Liu/MultimodalOCR.

Abstract of MDPBench: A Benchmark for Multilingual Document Parsing in Real-World Scenarios (arXiv:2603.28130, CC0)
Made by Huazhong University of Science and Technology (MultimodalOCR group) Released Mar 2026 Documents, charts and text in images Public tasks plus a private test set Last model added Jul 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
38
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 86.4 among models released by Jul 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 86.4
  2. 2 U2-OCR 86.0
  3. 3 Kimi K3 83.6
  4. 4 MonkeyOCRv2-B-Parsing 83.3
  5. 5 MonkeyOCRv2-S-Parsing 82.5
  6. 6 PepperOCR-VL 82.3
  7. 7 dots.mocr 80.5
  8. 8 chandra-ocr-2 79.7
  9. 9 realocr 79.4
  10. 10 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 78.9
  11. 11 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 78.3
  12. 12 Mistral-OCR-4.0 78.2
  13. 13 Kimi K2.5 77.5
  14. 14 HunyuanOCR-1.5 76.8
  15. 15 dots.ocr 76.5
  16. 16 Seed2.0 Pro 74.2
  17. 17 Claude Sonnet 4.6 73.1
  18. 18 MinerU-2.5-Pro-1.2B 71.0
  19. 19 olmOCR2 70.4
  20. 20 PaddleOCR-VL 69.6
  21. 21 GPT-5.2 68.6
  22. 22 HunyuanOCR 68.3
  23. 23 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 68.3
  24. 24 FalconOCR-1.5 67.9
  25. 25 GLM-OCR 67.3
  26. 26 Qwen3.5-9B 65.7
  27. 27 MonkeyOCRv1.5 65.0
  28. 28 Nanonets-OCR2-3B 64.2
  29. 29 LightOnOCR-2-1B 63.9
  30. 30 Nanonets-OCR-s 63.7
  31. 31 FalconOCR 56.3
  32. 32 Unlimited-OCR 54.1
  33. 33 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 52.2
  34. 34 DeepSeek-OCR 51.8
  35. 35 MinerU-2.5-VLM 46.3
  36. 36 PP-StructureV3 45.4
  37. 37 InternVL3.5-8B 42.7
  38. 38 MinerU-2.5-pipeline 33.5
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 86.4 Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 U2-OCR 86.0 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Kimi K3 83.6 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 MonkeyOCRv2-B-Parsing 83.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
5 MonkeyOCRv2-S-Parsing 82.5 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
6 PepperOCR-VL 82.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
7 dots.mocr 80.5 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
8 chandra-ocr-2 79.7 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
9 realocr 79.4 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
10 PaddleOCR-VL-1.6 78.9 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
11 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 78.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Mistral-OCR-4.0 78.2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Kimi K2.5 77.5 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
14 HunyuanOCR-1.5 76.8 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
15 dots.ocr 76.5 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Seed2.0 Pro 74.2 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Claude Sonnet 4.6 73.1 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
18 MinerU-2.5-Pro-1.2B 71.0 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
19 olmOCR2 70.4 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
20 PaddleOCR-VL 69.6 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
21 GPT-5.2 68.6 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
22 HunyuanOCR 68.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct 68.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
24 FalconOCR-1.5 67.9 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
25 GLM-OCR 67.3 Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen3.5-9B 65.7 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
27 MonkeyOCRv1.5 65.0 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
28 Nanonets-OCR2-3B 64.2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
29 LightOnOCR-2-1B 63.9 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
30 Nanonets-OCR-s 63.7 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
31 FalconOCR 56.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Unlimited-OCR 54.1 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
33 MonkeyOCR-pro-3B 52.2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
34 DeepSeek-OCR 51.8 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
35 MinerU-2.5-VLM 46.3 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
36 PP-StructureV3 45.4 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
37 InternVL3.5-8B 42.7 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
38 MinerU-2.5-pipeline 33.5 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 2026 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 2026

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%