MathVerse
Models solve diagram-based math problems shown in six versions that move information between the text and the image. It tests whether models read the diagram.
Labs usually report the testmini split.
In the authors’ words
The remarkable progress of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has garnered unparalleled attention, due to their superior performance in visual contexts. However, their capabilities in visual math problem-solving remain insufficiently evaluated and understood. We investigate current benchmarks to incorporate excessive visual content within textual questions, which potentially assist MLLMs in deducing answers without truly interpreting the input diagrams. To this end, we introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. Each problem is then transformed by human annotators into six distinct versions, each offering varying degrees of information content in multi-modality, contributing to 15K test samples in total. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning. In addition, we propose a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation strategy for a fine-grained assessment of the output answers. Rather than naively judging True or False, we employ GPT-4(V) to adaptively extract crucial reasoning steps, and then score each step with detailed error analysis, which can reveal the intermediate CoT reasoning quality by MLLMs. We hope the MathVerse benchmark may provide unique insights to guide the future development of MLLMs. Project page: https://mathverse-cuhk.github.io
- Level
- School Students, from grade school to high school
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 89.7% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 89.7%
- 2
ERNIE 5.0 85.1%
- 3
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85%
- 4
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 81%
- 5
STEP3-VL-10B 75.7%
- 6 GLM-4.6V 75.4%
- 7 GLM-4.5V 72.1%
- 8
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 68.5%
- 9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4%
- 10
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 58.2%
- 11
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 57.6%
- 12
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 44.9%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 89.7% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 85.1% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 85% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 81% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 75.7% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | GLM-4.6V | 75.4% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | GLM-4.5V | 72.1% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 68.5% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 68.4% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 58.2% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 57.6% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 44.9% | Mar 2026 | Model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 19 entries, 9 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Sep 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Mar 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Mar 2026 | 44.9 | MathVerse_MINI (default mode) | |
| 6 Feb 2026 | 85.1 | MathVerse | |
| 11 Nov 2025 | 81 | MathVerse | |
| 23 Sep 2025 | 85 | MathVerse_mini | |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 68.5 | MathVerse (vision-only) | |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 72.1 | MathVerse |
11 system cards report it, from 8 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 89.7 | MathVerse (Vision-Only) (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 4 Mar 2026 | | 44.9 | MathVerse MINI, default mode, 43.8 force nothink, 53.1 force thinking (Tables 5 and 6) | Capabilities |
| 4 Feb 2026 | | 85.1 | MathVerse (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 14 Jan 2026 | | 75.7 | MathVerse (vision), SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 78.30 | Capabilities |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 75.4 | MathVerse, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | 85 | MathVerse mini (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 58.2 | MathVerse-Mini (Vision-only), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 34.3 | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 68.5 | MathVerse (vision-only) (Table 2, Table 3). With parallel thinking 71.6 | Capabilities |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 72.1 | MathVerse, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 68.4 | MathVerse, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 57.6 | MathVerse mini (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%