Benchmark Almanac

MathVerse

Seed2.1 Pro 89.7% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Models solve diagram-based math problems shown in six versions that move information between the text and the image. It tests whether models read the diagram.

Labs usually report the testmini split.

In the authors’ words

The remarkable progress of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has garnered unparalleled attention, due to their superior performance in visual contexts. However, their capabilities in visual math problem-solving remain insufficiently evaluated and understood. We investigate current benchmarks to incorporate excessive visual content within textual questions, which potentially assist MLLMs in deducing answers without truly interpreting the input diagrams. To this end, we introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. Each problem is then transformed by human annotators into six distinct versions, each offering varying degrees of information content in multi-modality, contributing to 15K test samples in total. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning. In addition, we propose a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation strategy for a fine-grained assessment of the output answers. Rather than naively judging True or False, we employ GPT-4(V) to adaptively extract crucial reasoning steps, and then score each step with detailed error analysis, which can reveal the intermediate CoT reasoning quality by MLLMs. We hope the MathVerse benchmark may provide unique insights to guide the future development of MLLMs. Project page: https://mathverse-cuhk.github.io

Abstract of MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems? (arXiv:2403.14624, CC0)
Made by CUHK MMLab and Shanghai AI Laboratory Released Mar 2024 Visual math and diagrams All tasks public Last in a launch post Mar 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Jun 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
School Students, from grade school to high school
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
12
Models scored in lab cards
6
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
11
System cards report it, from 8 labs

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 89.7% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 89.7%
  2. 2 ERNIE 5.0 85.1%
  3. 3 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85%
  4. 4 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 81%
  5. 5 STEP3-VL-10B 75.7%
  6. 6 GLM-4.6V 75.4%
  7. 7 GLM-4.5V 72.1%
  8. 8 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 68.5%
  9. 9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4%
  10. 10 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 58.2%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 57.6%
  12. 12 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 44.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 89.7% Jun 2026 Model card
2 ERNIE 5.0 85.1% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85% Sep 2025 Model card
4 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 81% Nov 2025 Model card
5 STEP3-VL-10B 75.7% Jan 2026 Model card
6 GLM-4.6V 75.4% Jan 2026 Model card
7 GLM-4.5V 72.1% Aug 2025 Model card
8 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 68.5% Aug 2025 Model card
9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 68.4% Jul 2025 Model card
10 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 58.2% Nov 2025 Model card
11 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 57.6% Feb 2025 Model card
12 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 44.9% Mar 2026 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 19 entries, 9 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Qwen Z.ai Baidu ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2024
GPT-4V 39.4%
Lab claims Passed 85% in Sep 2025, by Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
Seed2.1 Pro 89.7%

The best score passed 85% in Sep 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro ERNIE 5.0 GLM-4.5V Qwen2.5-VL-72B GPT-4V LLaVA-v1.5-13B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro GLM-4.5V

Labs headline it less often now, last in Mar 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Z.ai
Shanghai AI Lab
Qwen
Baidu
Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
4 Mar 2026 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 44.9 MathVerse_MINI (default mode)
6 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 85.1 MathVerse
11 Nov 2025 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 81 MathVerse
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 85 MathVerse_mini
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 68.5 MathVerse (vision-only)
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 72.1 MathVerse

11 system cards report it, from 8 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 89.7 MathVerse (Vision-Only) (Table 9) Capabilities
4 Mar 2026 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B technical report 44.9 MathVerse MINI, default mode, 43.8 force nothink, 53.1 force thinking (Tables 5 and 6) Capabilities
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 85.1 MathVerse (Table 3) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 75.7 MathVerse (vision), SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 78.30 Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 75.4 MathVerse, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 85 MathVerse mini (Table 2) Capabilities
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 58.2 MathVerse-Mini (Vision-only), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 34.3 Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 68.5 MathVerse (vision-only) (Table 2, Table 3). With parallel thinking 71.6 Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 72.1 MathVerse, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 68.4 MathVerse, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 57.6 MathVerse mini (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%