Benchmark Almanac

GQA

Janus-Pro-7B 62% leads since Jan 2025 Fading

Models answer compositional questions about real-world images, generated from scene graphs. Scored by exact-match accuracy, often on the balanced test-dev split.

Recent vision-language model cards report the balanced test-dev split through VLMEvalKit.

In the authors’ words

We introduce GQA, a new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering, seeking to address key shortcomings of previous VQA datasets. We have developed a strong and robust question engine that leverages scene graph structures to create 22M diverse reasoning questions, all come with functional programs that represent their semantics. We use the programs to gain tight control over the answer distribution and present a new tunable smoothing technique to mitigate question biases. Accompanying the dataset is a suite of new metrics that evaluate essential qualities such as consistency, grounding and plausibility. An extensive analysis is performed for baselines as well as state-of-the-art models, providing fine-grained results for different question types and topologies. Whereas a blind LSTM obtains mere 42.1%, and strong VQA models achieve 54.1%, human performance tops at 89.3%, offering ample opportunity for new research to explore. We strongly hope GQA will provide an enabling resource for the next generation of models with enhanced robustness, improved consistency, and deeper semantic understanding for images and language.

Abstract of GQA: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answering (arXiv:1902.09506, CC0)
Made by Stanford University (Hudson and Manning) Released Feb 2019 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Aug 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Janus-Pro-7B leads with 62%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Janus-Pro-7B 62%
  2. 2 North Micro Vision Instruct 57.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Janus-Pro-7B 62% Jan 2025 Model card
2 North Micro Vision Instruct 57.4% Aug 2026 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Janus-Pro-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Janus-Pro-7B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
Cohere
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 Aug 2026 North Micro Vision Instruct 57.4 GQA TestDev_Balanced
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B 62 GQA

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B technical report 62 GQA (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%