Benchmark Almanac

GenEval

ERNIE 5.0 90.1% leads since Feb 2026 Fading

Text-to-image models draw prompts about object count, color, position and co-occurrence, and an object detector checks each image. Scored by the share of correct images.

Image generation has no own subcategory in the taxonomy, so it sits under generation in audio-video.

In the authors’ words

Recent breakthroughs in diffusion models, multimodal pretraining, and efficient finetuning have led to an explosion of text-to-image generative models. Given human evaluation is expensive and difficult to scale, automated methods are critical for evaluating the increasingly large number of new models. However, most current automated evaluation metrics like FID or CLIPScore only offer a holistic measure of image quality or image-text alignment, and are unsuited for fine-grained or instance-level analysis. In this paper, we introduce GenEval, an object-focused framework to evaluate compositional image properties such as object co-occurrence, position, count, and color. We show that current object detection models can be leveraged to evaluate text-to-image models on a variety of generation tasks with strong human agreement, and that other discriminative vision models can be linked to this pipeline to further verify properties like object color. We then evaluate several open-source text-to-image models and analyze their relative generative capabilities on our benchmark. We find that recent models demonstrate significant improvement on these tasks, though they are still lacking in complex capabilities such as spatial relations and attribute binding. Finally, we demonstrate how GenEval might be used to help discover existing failure modes, in order to inform development of the next generation of text-to-image models. Our code to run the GenEval framework is publicly available at https://github.com/djghosh13/geneval.

Abstract of GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignment (arXiv:2310.11513, CC0)
Made by University of Washington (Ghosh et al.) Released Oct 2023 Image generation and editing All tasks public Last in a launch post Feb 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Feb 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
3
System cards report it, from 3 labs

ERNIE 5.0 leads with 90.1% among models released by Jan 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jan 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 ERNIE 5.0 90.1%
  2. 2 BAGEL-7B-MoT 88%
  3. 3 Janus-Pro-7B 80%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 ERNIE 5.0 90.1% Feb 2026 Model card
2 BAGEL-7B-MoT 88% May 2025 Model card
3 Janus-Pro-7B 80% Jan 2025 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek ByteDance Seed Baidu
Lab claims Passed 85% in May 2025, by BAGEL-7B-MoT
ERNIE 5.0 90.1%

The best score passed 85% in May 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) ERNIE 5.0 BAGEL-7B-MoT Janus-Pro-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) ERNIE 5.0 BAGEL-7B-MoT

Labs headline it less often now, last in Feb 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
ByteDance Seed
Baidu
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
6 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 90.1 GenEval
20 May 2025 BAGEL-7B-MoT 0.88 GenEval Overall
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B 80 GenEval Overall 0.80

3 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 90.1 GenEval (Table 5) Capabilities
20 May 2025 BAGEL-7B-MoT technical report 88 GenEval Overall 0.88, with LLM rewriter (Table 5). Without rewriter 0.82 Capabilities
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B technical report 80 GenEval Overall 0.80 (Table 4). Single Obj. 0.99, Two Obj. 0.89, Counting 0.59, Colors 0.90, Position 0.79, Color Attri. 0.66 Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%