Benchmark Almanac

EMMA

Seed2.1 Pro 79.3% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Models solve math, physics, chemistry and coding problems that need reasoning over text and images together, not each alone. Answers are checked against a key.

ByteDance Seed reports it in the Seed1.8 and Seed2.0 model cards.

In the authors’ words

The ability to organically reason over and with both text and images is a pillar of human intelligence, yet the ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to perform such multimodal reasoning remains under-explored. Existing benchmarks often emphasize text-dominant reasoning or rely on shallow visual cues, failing to adequately assess integrated visual and textual reasoning. We introduce EMMA (Enhanced MultiModal reAsoning), a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding. EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality, offering an enhanced test suite for MLLMs' reasoning capabilities. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks, even with advanced techniques like Chain-of-Thought prompting and test-time compute scaling underperforming. These findings underscore the need for improved multimodal architectures and training paradigms to close the gap between human and model reasoning in multimodality.

Abstract of Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark (arXiv:2501.05444, CC0)
Made by Hao et al. (EMMA team) Released Jan 2025 Visual math and diagrams Last in a launch post Dec 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
3
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 79.3% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 79.3%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 72%
  3. 3 Seed1.8 60.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 79.3% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 72% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Seed1.8 60.9% Dec 2025 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 79.3%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed2.0 Pro

Labs headline it less often now, last in Dec 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 60.9 EMMA

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 79.3 EMMA (Table 9) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 60.9 EMMA (Table 2). 50.1 in No-Think mode (2.4 text) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 72 EMMA (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%