Benchmark Almanac

DeepsecBench

GPT-6 Sol 40.8 leads since Sep 2026 Not in model cards

Agents review 50 entry-point files of an open-source codebase, at a commit just before many vulnerabilities were fixed, and report findings. Scored by recall-weighted F2 against 231 human-judged findings.

Models read source only and never run or exploit the app. Vercel reports cost and speed too. Artificial Analysis runs DeepsecBench-AA in its Cyber Index with its own harness, so scores differ.

Made by Vercel Released Jul 2026 Finding and exploiting real bugs Tasks kept private Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by people Human experts grade or compare the outputs.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
28
Models scored on its own leaderboard

GPT-6 Sol leads with 40.8

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.

  1. 1 GPT-6 Sol xhigh 40.8
  2. 2 GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh 39.5
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra xhigh 37.6
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 37.5
  5. 5 Kimi K3.1 Pro max 37.5
  6. 6 GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh 35.3
  7. 7 Claude Opus 5 max 32.3
  8. 8 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max 30.0
  9. 9 GPT-5.6 Luna xhigh 26.6
  10. 10 Claude Opus 5.5 max 26.6
  11. 11 GLM-5.3 high 21.8
  12. 12 GPT-5.5 xhigh 21.0
  13. 13 GPT-6 Luna xhigh 21.0
  14. 14 GPT-5.6 Terra xhigh 19.1
  15. 15 Kimi K3 xhigh 17.4
  16. 16 DeepSeek-V4-Flash xhigh 16.4
  17. 17 Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 16.4
  18. 18 Grok 4.5 medium 16.4
  19. 19 Grok 4.6 xhigh 16.1
  20. 20 Claude Sonnet 5 max 14.9
  21. 21 GLM-5.3-Flash high 12.9
  22. 22 Gemini 3.6 Flash medium 11.5
  23. 23 Grok 4.7 xhigh 10.9
  24. 24 GLM-5.2 medium 10.4
  25. 25 Claude Opus 4.8 max 6.86
  26. 26 Inkling xhigh 6.27
  27. 27 Claude Haiku 4.5 4.69
  28. 28 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium 2.13
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6 Sol 40.8 xhigh, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-6.1 Sol 39.5 xhigh, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Astra 37.6 xhigh, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 5.5 37.5 max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi K3.1 Pro 37.5 max, Pi Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5.6 Sol 35.3 xhigh, Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Opus 5 32.3 max, Claude Code Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 30.0 max, Pi Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.6 Luna 26.6 xhigh, Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Opus 5.5 26.6 max, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 GLM-5.3 21.8 high, Pi Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-5.5 21.0 xhigh, Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
13 GPT-6 Luna 21.0 xhigh, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GPT-5.6 Terra 19.1 xhigh, Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Kimi K3 17.4 xhigh, Pi Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
16 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 16.4 xhigh, Pi Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen 3.8 Max 16.4 xhigh, Pi Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Grok 4.5 16.4 medium, Pi Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Grok 4.6 16.1 xhigh, Pi Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Claude Sonnet 5 14.9 max, Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
21 GLM-5.3-Flash 12.9 high, Pi Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Gemini 3.6 Flash 11.5 medium, Pi Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Grok 4.7 10.9 xhigh, Pi Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
24 GLM-5.2 10.4 medium, Pi Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Opus 4.8 6.86 max, Claude Code May 2026 Official leaderboard
26 Inkling 6.27 xhigh, Pi Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
27 Claude Haiku 4.5 4.69 Claude Code Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 2.13 medium, Pi Jul 2026 Official leaderboard

More effort adds a median 6 score

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
GPT-6 Sol Codex
medium xhigh
40.8
GPT-6.1 Sol Codex
medium xhigh
39.5
GPT-6 Astra Codex
medium xhigh
37.6
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Code
medium max
37.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro Pi
high max
37.5
GPT-5.6 Sol Codex
medium xhigh
35.3
Claude Opus 5 Claude Code
medium max
32.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Pi
high max
30.0
GPT-5.6 Luna Codex
medium xhigh
26.6
Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Code
medium max
26.6
GLM-5.3 Pi
high
21.8
GPT-5.5 Codex
medium xhigh
21.0
ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-6 Sol xhigh Codex 40.8
GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh Codex 39.5
GPT-6 Astra xhigh Codex 37.6
Claude Sonnet 5.5 max Claude Code 37.5
Kimi K3.1 Pro max Pi 37.5
GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh Codex 35.3
Claude Opus 5 max Claude Code 32.3
GPT-6.1 Sol medium Codex 30.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max Pi 30.0
GPT-6 Astra medium Codex 29.2
GPT-6 Sol medium Codex 29.2
Kimi K3.1 Pro high Pi 28.7
Claude Opus 5 medium Claude Code 28.1
GPT-5.6 Luna xhigh Codex 26.6
Claude Opus 5.5 max Claude Code 26.6
GPT-5.6 Sol medium Codex 24.9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 high Pi 24.7
GLM-5.3 high Pi 21.8
GPT-5.5 xhigh Codex 21.0
GPT-6 Luna xhigh Codex 21.0
GLM-5.3 max Pi 20.3
GPT-5.6 Terra xhigh Codex 19.1
Kimi K3 xhigh Pi 17.4
DeepSeek-V4-Flash xhigh Pi 16.4
Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh Pi 16.4
Grok 4.5 medium Pi 16.4
Grok 4.6 xhigh Pi 16.1
Qwen 3.8 Max medium Pi 15.5
Grok 4.5 xhigh Pi 15.4
DeepSeek-V4-Flash medium Pi 15.3
Claude Sonnet 5 max Claude Code 14.9
GPT-6 Luna medium Codex 13.5
GLM-5.3-Flash high Pi 12.9
GPT-5.5 medium Codex 12.5
GPT-5.6 Terra medium Codex 12.0
GPT-5.6 Luna medium Codex 12.0
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium Claude Code 11.5
Gemini 3.6 Flash medium Pi 11.5
Kimi K3 medium Pi 11.4
Grok 4.7 xhigh Pi 10.9
GLM-5.3-Flash max Pi 10.9
GLM-5.2 medium Pi 10.4
Claude Opus 5.5 medium Claude Code 9.95
GLM-5.2 xhigh Pi 9.82
Gemini 3.6 Flash xhigh Pi 8.91
Grok 4.7 medium Pi 7.81
Claude Opus 4.8 max Claude Code 6.86
Claude Opus 4.8 medium Claude Code 6.82
Inkling xhigh Pi 6.27
Claude Sonnet 5 medium Claude Code 5.79
Inkling medium Pi 5.21
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Code 4.69
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Pi 2.13
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite xhigh Pi 1.06

4 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard 4 leaders
GPT-6 Sol 40.8

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.00 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 2026 2027 0.00 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 2026 2027

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Cybersecurity

All 111 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CWE-bench In use Agents audit a repository and write a patch for a security flaw, without being told where the bug is. Covers six programming languages. Gemini 4 Carbon 71%
  • Real-world vulnerability discovery In use Agents search popular open-source codebases to rediscover about 1,200 recent confirmed vulnerabilities across many languages. Reports share discovered. Gemini 4 Argon 86%
  • Artificial Analysis Cyber Index In use Agents do enterprise cyber defense tasks from three benchmarks, CWE-Bench-AA, DeepsecBench-AA and CyberGym-E2E-AA, combined into one success rate. Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 51%
  • Big Sleep Evaluation (Google) In use Agents search large real codebases such as Chrome and Safari for critical, hard to find vulnerabilities. Scored by pass@1 success rate, run without safety guardrails. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber 72%