Benchmark Almanac

Cyber-harness network challenges (Incalmo cyber ranges)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet 66.7% Only in system cards

Agents run long-horizon attacks on cyber ranges of 25 to 50 hosts using a specialized offensive harness.

Built with Carnegie Mellon University, as described in the Incalmo paper. The ranges are not public.

Made by Anthropic Released May 2025 Finding and exploiting real bugs Tasks kept private Last in a system card Sep 2025 Last model added Sep 2025
Level
Research frontier Researchers, on open problems or tasks that take days
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
1
Model scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 66.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 66.7%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 66.7% Feb 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
29 Sep 2025 Claude Sonnet 4.5 system card Incalmo cyber ranges, bash shell on Kali without the Incalmo harness, no overall. Asset acquisition on all 4 ranges with any model success (Equifax, 4-Chain, Dumbbell A, 4-Star), none on 5 others. Comprehensiveness 1.00, 0.32, 1.00, 0.48. Reliability 2, 3, 4, 3 of 5 trials (Figures 5.3.2.A to 5.3.2.C) Cyber risk
22 May 2025 Claude Opus 4 system card Cyber-harness network challenges (Incalmo, three ranges), no number printed. Text says generally higher than Claude Sonnet 3.7 on all three ranges (7.4.6) Cyber risk
24 Feb 2025 Claude 3.7 Sonnet system card 66.7 Cyber-harness network challenges (three cyber ranges), 2/3 solved, pass@5 (1/1 easy, 1/2 medium) (7.3.2, Figure 24) Cyber risk

More in Cybersecurity

All 111 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CWE-bench In use Agents audit a repository and write a patch for a security flaw, without being told where the bug is. Covers six programming languages. Gemini 4 Carbon 71%
  • Real-world vulnerability discovery In use Agents search popular open-source codebases to rediscover about 1,200 recent confirmed vulnerabilities across many languages. Reports share discovered. Gemini 4 Argon 86%
  • Artificial Analysis Cyber Index In use Agents do enterprise cyber defense tasks from three benchmarks, CWE-Bench-AA, DeepsecBench-AA and CyberGym-E2E-AA, combined into one success rate. Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 51%
  • Big Sleep Evaluation (Google) In use Agents search large real codebases such as Chrome and Safari for critical, hard to find vulnerabilities. Scored by pass@1 success rate, run without safety guardrails. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber 72%