Benchmark Almanac

CountBench

Qwen3.6 27B 97.8% leads since Apr 2026 In use

Models count the objects in natural images from the CountBench image-text set. Lab cards often use a question-answer version, CountBenchQA, scored by accuracy.

In the authors’ words

Large vision-language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, learn rich joint image-text representations, facilitating advances in numerous downstream tasks, including zero-shot classification and text-to-image generation. Nevertheless, existing VLMs exhibit a prominent well-documented limitation - they fail to encapsulate compositional concepts such as counting. We introduce a simple yet effective method to improve the quantitative understanding of VLMs, while maintaining their overall performance on common benchmarks. Specifically, we propose a new counting-contrastive loss used to finetune a pre-trained VLM in tandem with its original objective. Our counting loss is deployed over automatically-created counterfactual examples, each consisting of an image and a caption containing an incorrect object count. For example, an image depicting three dogs is paired with the caption "Six dogs playing in the yard". Our loss encourages discrimination between the correct caption and its counterfactual variant which serves as a hard negative example. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to extend CLIP's capabilities to object counting. Furthermore, we introduce "CountBench" - a new image-text counting benchmark for evaluating a model's understanding of object counting. We demonstrate a significant improvement over state-of-the-art baseline models on this task. Finally, we leverage our count-aware CLIP model for image retrieval and text-conditioned image generation, demonstrating that our model can produce specific counts of objects more reliably than existing ones.

Abstract of Teaching CLIP to Count to Ten (arXiv:2302.12066, CC0)
Made by Google Research Released Feb 2023 Spatial reasoning and counting All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Aug 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
20
Models scored in lab cards
15
Launch posts list it, from 7 labs
13
System cards report it, from 6 labs

Qwen3.6 27B leads with 97.8% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.6 27B 97.8%
  2. 2 Qwen 3.6 Plus 97.6%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 97.2%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 97%
  5. 5 ERNIE 5.0 96.5%
  6. 6 Seed1.8 96.3%
  7. 7 Seed2.0 Pro 95.5%
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 95.1%
  9. 9 Seed1.5-VL 93.7%
  10. 10 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 93.7%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 93.6%
  12. 12 LongCat-Flash-Omni 92.4%
  13. 13 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 90%
  14. 14 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 89%
  15. 15 STEP3-VL-10B 88.8%
  16. 16 LFM2.5-VL-3B 87.3%
  17. 17 North Micro Vision Instruct 72.5%
  18. 18 Gemma 3 27B 68%
  19. 19 Gemma 3 4B 26.1%
  20. 20 Gemma 3 12B 17.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.6 27B 97.8% Apr 2026 Model card
2 Qwen 3.6 Plus 97.6% Apr 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 97.2% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 97% Feb 2026 Model card
5 ERNIE 5.0 96.5% Feb 2026 Model card
6 Seed1.8 96.3% Dec 2025 Model card
7 Seed2.0 Pro 95.5% Feb 2026 Model card
8 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 95.1% Mar 2026 Model card
9 Seed1.5-VL 93.7% May 2025 Model card
10 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 93.7% Sep 2025 Model card
11 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 93.6% Feb 2025 Model card
12 LongCat-Flash-Omni 92.4% Oct 2025 Model card
13 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 90% Sep 2025 Model card
14 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 89% Nov 2025 Model card
15 STEP3-VL-10B 88.8% Jan 2026 Model card
16 LFM2.5-VL-3B 87.3% Aug 2026 Model card
17 North Micro Vision Instruct 72.5% Aug 2026 Model card
18 Gemma 3 27B 68% Mar 2025 Model card
19 Gemma 3 4B 26.1% Mar 2025 Model card
20 Gemma 3 12B 17.8% Mar 2025 Model card

7 models have held number one since its release in Feb 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen ByteDance Seed Baidu
Lab claims Passed 85% in Feb 2025, by Qwen2.5-VL-72B
Qwen3.6 27B 97.8%

The best score passed 85% in Feb 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.6 27B Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.6 27B Seed1.5-VL

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
ByteDance Seed
Qwen
Meituan
Baidu
Cohere
Liquid AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 Aug 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 87.3 CountBenchQA
12 Aug 2026 North Micro Vision Instruct 72.5 CountBench
22 Apr 2026 Qwen3.6 27B 97.8 CountBench
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 97.6 CountBench
30 Mar 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 95.1 CountBench
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 97 CountBench
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 97.2 CountBench
6 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 96.5 CountBench
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 96.3 CountBench
11 Nov 2025 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 89 CountBench
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 92.4 CountBench
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 93.7 CountBench
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 90 CountBench
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 93.7 CountBench
12 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B 68 CountBenchQA (PT)

13 system cards report it, from 6 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
17 Apr 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 95.1 CountBench (Table 6) Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 96.3 CountBench (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 95.5 CountBench (Table 8) Capabilities
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 96.5 CountBench (Table 3) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 88.8 CountBench, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 88.80 Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 93.7 CountBench (Table 2) Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 92.4 CountBench (Table 5) Capabilities
22 Sep 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 90 CountBench, Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 88.6 (Table 10) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 93.7 CountBench, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 93.5 Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 26.1 CountBench VQA, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 68 CountBench VQA, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 17.8 CountBench VQA, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 93.6 CountBench, detect then count prompt (Table 7) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%