Benchmark Almanac

ChartQA Pro

Claude Opus 4.8 72.3% leads since May 2026 Fading

Model answers 1,948 diverse questions over 1,341 charts, infographics and dashboards, including conversational and unanswerable ones. Accuracy.

ACL 2025 Findings.

In the authors’ words

Charts are ubiquitous, as people often use them to analyze data, answer questions, and discover critical insights. However, performing complex analytical tasks with charts requires significant perceptual and cognitive effort. Chart Question Answering (CQA) systems automate this process by enabling models to interpret and reason with visual representations of data. However, existing benchmarks like ChartQA lack real-world diversity and have recently shown performance saturation with modern large vision-language models (LVLMs). To address these limitations, we introduce ChartQAPro, a new benchmark that includes 1,341 charts from 157 diverse sources, spanning various chart types, including infographics and dashboards, and featuring 1,948 questions in various types, such as multiple-choice, conversational, hypothetical, and unanswerable questions, to better reflect real-world challenges. Our evaluations with 21 models show a substantial performance drop for LVLMs on ChartQAPro; e.g., Claude Sonnet 3.5 scores 90.5% on ChartQA but only 55.81% on ChartQAPro, underscoring the complexity of chart reasoning. We complement our findings with detailed error analyses and ablation studies, identifying key challenges and opportunities for advancing LVLMs in chart understanding and reasoning. We release ChartQAPro at https://github.com/vis-nlp/ChartQAPro.

Abstract of ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering (arXiv:2504.05506, CC0)
Made by vis-nlp (Masry et al.) Released Apr 2025 Documents, charts and text in images All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
8
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
7
System cards report it, from 4 labs

Claude Opus 4.8 leads with 72.3% among models released by Sep 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.8 72.3%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 71.2%
  3. 3 Intern-S2-397B 71.1%
  4. 4 Seed2.1 Pro 70.9%
  5. 5 GLM-4.6V 65.5%
  6. 6 GLM-4.5V 64%
  7. 7 EXAONE 4.5 33B 62.2%
  8. 8 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59.5%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.8 72.3% May 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 71.2% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Intern-S2-397B 71.1% Sep 2026 Model card
4 Seed2.1 Pro 70.9% Jun 2026 Model card
5 GLM-4.6V 65.5% Dec 2025 Model card
6 GLM-4.5V 64% Aug 2025 Model card
7 EXAONE 4.5 33B 62.2% Apr 2026 Model card
8 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59.5% Jul 2025 Model card

5 models have held number one since its release in Apr 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Z.ai ByteDance Seed Anthropic
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.8 Seed2.0 Pro GLM-4.6V GLM-4.5V GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.8 GLM-4.6V

Labs headline it less often now, last in Sep 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Z.ai
ByteDance Seed
LG AI Research
Anthropic
Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
13 Sep 2026 Intern-S2-397B 71.1 ChartQAPro
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 72.3 ChartQAPro (with tools)
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 62.2 ChartQAPro
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 71.2 ChartQAPro
8 Dec 2025 GLM-4.6V 65.5 ChartQAPro
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 64 ChartQAPro
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59.5 ChartQAPro

7 system cards report it, from 4 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 70.9 ChartQAPro (Table 9) Capabilities
28 May 2026 Claude Opus 4.8 system card 69.4 ChartQAPro, no tools, max effort, five runs (72.3% with Python tools) (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.1) Capabilities
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 62.2 ChartQAPro (Table 2, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 71.2 ChartQAPro (Table 8) Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 65.5 ChartQAPro, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 64 ChartQAPro, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 59.5 ChartQAPro, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities

Versions

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%