ChartQA Pro
Model answers 1,948 diverse questions over 1,341 charts, infographics and dashboards, including conversational and unanswerable ones. Accuracy.
ACL 2025 Findings.
In the authors’ words
Charts are ubiquitous, as people often use them to analyze data, answer questions, and discover critical insights. However, performing complex analytical tasks with charts requires significant perceptual and cognitive effort. Chart Question Answering (CQA) systems automate this process by enabling models to interpret and reason with visual representations of data. However, existing benchmarks like ChartQA lack real-world diversity and have recently shown performance saturation with modern large vision-language models (LVLMs). To address these limitations, we introduce ChartQAPro, a new benchmark that includes 1,341 charts from 157 diverse sources, spanning various chart types, including infographics and dashboards, and featuring 1,948 questions in various types, such as multiple-choice, conversational, hypothetical, and unanswerable questions, to better reflect real-world challenges. Our evaluations with 21 models show a substantial performance drop for LVLMs on ChartQAPro; e.g., Claude Sonnet 3.5 scores 90.5% on ChartQA but only 55.81% on ChartQAPro, underscoring the complexity of chart reasoning. We complement our findings with detailed error analyses and ablation studies, identifying key challenges and opportunities for advancing LVLMs in chart understanding and reasoning. We release ChartQAPro at https://github.com/vis-nlp/ChartQAPro.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Claude Opus 4.8 leads with 72.3% among models released by Sep 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- and 15 more
- 1 Claude Opus 4.8 72.3%
- 2
Seed2.0 Pro 71.2%
- 3
Intern-S2-397B 71.1%
- 4
Seed2.1 Pro 70.9%
- 5 GLM-4.6V 65.5%
- 6 GLM-4.5V 64%
- 7
EXAONE 4.5 33B 62.2%
- 8 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 59.5%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 72.3% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 71.2% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 71.1% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 70.9% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | GLM-4.6V | 65.5% | Dec 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | GLM-4.5V | 64% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 62.2% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 8 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 59.5% | Jul 2025 | Model card |
5 models have held number one since its release in Apr 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Sep 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Sep 2026 | 71.1 | ChartQAPro | |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 72.3 | ChartQAPro (with tools) |
| 9 Apr 2026 | 62.2 | ChartQAPro | |
| 14 Feb 2026 | 71.2 | ChartQAPro | |
| 8 Dec 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 65.5 | ChartQAPro |
| 11 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 64 | ChartQAPro |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 59.5 | ChartQAPro |
7 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 70.9 | ChartQAPro (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 28 May 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 69.4 | ChartQAPro, no tools, max effort, five runs (72.3% with Python tools) (Table 8.1.A, 8.12.1) | Capabilities |
| 9 Apr 2026 | | 62.2 | ChartQAPro (Table 2, Reasoning mode) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 71.2 | ChartQAPro (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jan 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 65.5 | ChartQAPro, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 13 Aug 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 64 | ChartQAPro, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 1 Jul 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 59.5 | ChartQAPro, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%