Benchmark Almanac

Chartography

Kimi K3.1 Pro 90.2% leads since Oct 2026 In use

100 tasks on specialized professional charts (Kaplan-Meier, candlestick, Sankey, Bode). Answers graded against expert references.

In the authors’ words

Professionals across medicine, engineering, finance, manufacturing, and the sciences often make consequential decisions from charts. Existing chart benchmarks do not sufficiently measure this ability: they are dominated by bar, line, and pie formats, rely on shorter reasoning chains, and are nearing saturation, with frontier models already scoring 80-90%. We introduce Chartography, a benchmark of 100 tasks that pair charts drawn from professional practice, in domain-specific formats that standard chart benchmarks rarely include, with questions written by professionals who read these charts for a living and independently verified by three additional experts. In an evaluation of 30 frontier-model configurations (20 scored trials per task), the best configuration reaches only 45.0% mean pass@1; the remainder span 9.0-39.5%. Failures concentrate in visual perception: models can miss nuanced features, misread values along sparsely labeled axes, mishandle projected 3D geometry, and violate domain conventions encoded in the chart. We release all tasks, images, provenance metadata, and evaluation code.

Abstract of Chartography: A Benchmark for Professional Chart Understanding (arXiv:2608.10677, CC0)
Made by Surge AI Released Aug 2026 Documents, charts and text in images Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
12
Models scored in lab cards
10
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
7
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 90.2%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 90.2%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5.5 89%
  3. 3 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 83%
  4. 4 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 78.9%
  5. 5 GLM-5.3-Flash 78%
  6. 6 Gemini 4 Carbon 72.5%
  7. 7 Gemini 4 Argon 71.6%
  8. 8 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp 64.3%
  9. 9 Claude Sonnet 5.5 61.6%
  10. 10 Claude Haiku 5.5 46.4%
  11. 11 Claude Fable 5.1 42.6%
  12. 12 Claude Opus 5 29.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 90.2% Oct 2026 Model card
2 Claude Opus 5.5 89% Sep 2026 Model card
3 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 83% Oct 2026 Model card
4 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 78.9% Sep 2026 Model card
5 GLM-5.3-Flash 78% Aug 2026 Model card
6 Gemini 4 Carbon 72.5% Oct 2026 Model card
7 Gemini 4 Argon 71.6% Oct 2026 Model card
8 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp 64.3% Aug 2026 Model card
9 Claude Sonnet 5.5 61.6% Sep 2026 Model card
10 Claude Haiku 5.5 46.4% Oct 2026 Model card
11 Claude Fable 5.1 42.6% Sep 2026 Model card
12 Claude Opus 5 29.6% Jul 2026 Model card

6 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic DeepSeek Z.ai Moonshot AI
Lab claims Passed 85% in Sep 2026, by Claude Opus 5.5

The best score passed 85% in Sep 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3.1 Pro DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp Claude Opus 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K3.1 Pro DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

5 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
Z.ai
Anthropic
Google DeepMind
Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
28 Oct 2026 Gemini 4 Carbon 72.5 Chartography
24 Oct 2026 Kimi K3.1 Pro 90.2 ChartoGraphy w/ python
17 Oct 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 83 Chartography (w/tools)
13 Oct 2026 Gemini 4 Argon 71.6 Chartography
7 Oct 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 46.4 Visual reasoning Chartography (no tools)
28 Sep 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 61.6 Visual chart recognition Chartography (no tools)
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 89 Visual chart recognition Chartography (with tools)
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 78.9 Chartography w/ tools (Pass@1)
26 Aug 2026 GLM-5.3-Flash 78 Chartography (w/ Tools)
21 Aug 2026 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp 64.3 Chartography

7 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
13 Oct 2026 Gemini 4 Argon model card 71.6 Chartography (results table, p.5) Capabilities
7 Oct 2026 Claude Haiku 5.5 system card 46.4 Chartography, no tools, max effort (with tools 86.2) (8.9.1) Capabilities
28 Sep 2026 Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card 61.6 Chartography without tools, max effort (90.2% with tools) (8.13.1, Figure 8.13.1.A) Capabilities
22 Sep 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card 64.4 Chartography, no tools, adaptive thinking at max effort, five runs (89.0% with tools), Gemini 3.5 Flash grader (8.13.1, Figure 8.13.1.A) Capabilities
10 Sep 2026 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash technical report 78.9 Chartography w/ tools (Pass@1) (Table 3) Capabilities
1 Sep 2026 Claude Fable 5.1 system card 42.6 Chartography, no tools, adaptive thinking max effort, 5 runs; 86.2% with tools (8.14.1) Capabilities
24 Jul 2026 Claude Opus 5 system card 29.6 Chartography, no tools, adaptive thinking at max effort, five runs (83.0% with tools) (8.12.1) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%