Benchmark Almanac

CAD Arena

Gemini 4 Argon 0.75 leads since Sep 2026 Not in model cards

Agents rebuild licensed engineering drawings as editable CAD parts through the scripting APIs of NX, SolidWorks, Onshape, Fusion or Build123d. A verifier scores geometric match.

90 tasks scored by Normal's FrontierCAD verifier on a 0 to 100 scale. 12 models in the Fireworks index.

Made by Normal Research Released Sep 2026 CAD models Tasks kept private Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
13
Entries on its own leaderboard, 12 models we track

Gemini 4 Argon leads with 0.75

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 Gemini 4 Argon 0.75
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5.5 0.75
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra 0.67
  4. 4 Claude Fable 5.1 0.66
  5. 5 GPT-6 Sol 0.53
  6. 6 Gemini 3.8 Flash 0.41
  7. 7 Grok 4.6 0.35
  8. 8 Muse 1.3 0.32
  9. 9 GPT-6 Luna 0.30
  10. 10 Grok 4.7 0.26
  11. 11 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 0.19
  12. 12 Inkling-Small 0.14
  13. 13 Inkling 0.12
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 4 Argon 0.75 Gemini CLI Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 5.5 0.75 Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Astra 0.67 Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Fable 5.1 0.66 Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-6 Sol 0.53 Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 3.8 Flash 0.41 Gemini CLI Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Grok 4.6 0.35 Grok Build Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Muse 1.3 0.32 Muse Code Official leaderboard
9 GPT-6 Luna 0.30 Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Grok 4.7 0.26 Grok Build Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 0.19 OpenCode Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Inkling-Small 0.14 OpenCode Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Inkling 0.12 OpenCode Jul 2026 Official leaderboard

4 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard 4 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 2026 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 2026

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Engineering and CAD

All 18 in Engineering and CAD
  • BenchCAD In use Programmatic CAD: 17,900 execution-verified CadQuery programs over 106 industrial part families. Four matched tasks scored on geometry. GPT-6 Astra 95.9%
  • EEBench In use 13 electrical-engineering circuit and PCB design tasks graded by deterministic build checks, simulation and BOM constraints. No LLM judge. Claude Opus 5.5 75%
  • Parametric CAD Bench In use Agents author editable parametric FreeCAD part designs, graded against held-back references for geometry and spec consistency. Claude Opus 5.5 61%
  • CADGenBench Only in system cards Agents construct CAD models from design prompts. The generation split is graded for executability and geometric correctness. Claude Fable 5 45.1%
  • 3DCodeBench Only in system cards Agentic procedural 3D modeling via code: author engine-ready 3D assets through software APIs. Graded for executability and shape fidelity. Grok 4.6 54%
  • PartBench Only in system cards Parametric mechanical part design and CAD-style generation, graded for geometric and manufacturing fidelity. Grok 4.6 58.5%