Benchmark Almanac

BLINK

Seed2.1 Pro 81.4% leads since Jun 2026 In use

Models answer 3,807 multiple choice questions built from 14 classic computer vision tasks that use one or more images. Scoring is accuracy.

Test answers are hidden on EvalAI, so model cards usually report the 1,901 question validation split.

In the authors’ words

We introduce Blink, a new benchmark for multimodal language models (LLMs) that focuses on core visual perception abilities not found in other evaluations. Most of the Blink tasks can be solved by humans "within a blink" (e.g., relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, and multi-view reasoning). However, we find these perception-demanding tasks cast significant challenges for current multimodal LLMs because they resist mediation through natural language. Blink reformats 14 classic computer vision tasks into 3,807 multiple-choice questions, paired with single or multiple images and visual prompting. While humans get 95.70% accuracy on average, Blink is surprisingly challenging for existing multimodal LLMs: even the best-performing GPT-4V and Gemini achieve accuracies of 51.26% and 45.72%, only 13.17% and 7.63% higher than random guessing, indicating that such perception abilities have not "emerged" yet in recent multimodal LLMs. Our analysis also highlights that specialist CV models could solve these problems much better, suggesting potential pathways for future improvements. We believe Blink will stimulate the community to help multimodal LLMs catch up with human-level visual perception.

Abstract of BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive (arXiv:2404.12390, CC0)
Made by Xingyu Fu et al. Released Apr 2024 General visual questions Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Aug 2026 Last model added Aug 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
28
Models scored in lab cards
18
Launch posts list it, from 12 labs
23
System cards report it, from 13 labs

Seed2.1 Pro leads with 81.4% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Seed2.1 Pro 81.4%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 79.5%
  3. 3 Kimi K2.5 78.9%
  4. 4 Seed1.8 74.3%
  5. 5 Seed1.5-VL 72.1%
  6. 6 ERNIE 5.0 70%
  7. 7 EXAONE 4.5 33B 68.8%
  8. 8 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 68%
  9. 9 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 67.1%
  10. 10 STEP3-VL-10B 66.8%
  11. 11 GLM-4.6V 65.5%
  12. 12 GLM-4.5V 65.3%
  13. 13 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 65.1%
  14. 14 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 64.4%
  15. 15 LongCat-Flash-Omni 63.1%
  16. 16 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 62.8%
  17. 17 LFM2.5-VL-3B 61.5%
  18. 18 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 61.4%
  19. 19 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 61.4%
  20. 20 Phi-4-multimodal 61.3%
  21. 21 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 57.8%
  22. 22 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 57%
  23. 23 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 56.7%
  24. 24 North Micro Vision Instruct 52.7%
  25. 25 LFM2-VL-1.6B 44.5%
  26. 26 Gemma 3 27B 39.6%
  27. 27 Gemma 3 4B 38%
  28. 28 Gemma 3 12B 35.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.1 Pro 81.4% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 79.5% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Kimi K2.5 78.9% Jan 2026 Model card
4 Seed1.8 74.3% Dec 2025 Model card
5 Seed1.5-VL 72.1% May 2025 Model card
6 ERNIE 5.0 70% Feb 2026 Model card
7 EXAONE 4.5 33B 68.8% Apr 2026 Model card
8 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 68% Jan 2026 Model card
9 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 67.1% Sep 2025 Model card
10 STEP3-VL-10B 66.8% Jan 2026 Model card
11 GLM-4.6V 65.5% Dec 2025 Model card
12 GLM-4.5V 65.3% Aug 2025 Model card
13 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 65.1% Jul 2025 Model card
14 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 64.4% Feb 2025 Model card
15 LongCat-Flash-Omni 63.1% Oct 2025 Model card
16 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 62.8% Nov 2025 Model card
17 LFM2.5-VL-3B 61.5% Aug 2026 Model card
18 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 61.4% May 2024 Model card
19 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 61.4% Aug 2025 Model card
20 Phi-4-multimodal 61.3% Feb 2025 Model card
21 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview 57.8% Sep 2025 Model card
22 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 57% Aug 2024 Model card
23 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 56.7% Nov 2025 Model card
24 North Micro Vision Instruct 52.7% Aug 2026 Model card
25 LFM2-VL-1.6B 44.5% Nov 2025 Model card
26 Gemma 3 27B 39.6% Mar 2025 Model card
27 Gemma 3 4B 38% Mar 2025 Model card
28 Gemma 3 12B 35.9% Mar 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 17 entries, 11 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Google DeepMind Qwen ByteDance Seed Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2024
GPT-4V 51.3%
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Seed2.1 Pro 81.4%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.8 Seed1.5-VL Qwen2.5-VL-72B Gemini 1.5 Pro GPT-4V LLaVA-v1.5-13B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.1 Pro Seed1.8

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Microsoft
ByteDance Seed
Z.ai
Liquid AI
Qwen
Meituan
Baidu
SenseTime
StepFun
LG AI Research
Cohere
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 Aug 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 61.5 BLINK
12 Aug 2026 North Micro Vision Instruct 52.7 BLINK
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 68.8 BLINK
6 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 70 BLINK
13 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B 66.8 BLINK
8 Jan 2026 SenseNova-SI-1.3-InternVL3-8B 68 BLINK
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 74.3 BLINK
8 Dec 2025 GLM-4.6V 65.5 BLINK (Val)
11 Nov 2025 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 62.8 BLINK
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 63.1 BLINK
23 Sep 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 67.1 BLINK
12 Aug 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B 44.4 BLINK
11 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V 65.3 BLINK (val)
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 65.1 BLINK
12 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL 72.1 BLINK
12 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B 39.6 BLINK (PT)
26 Feb 2025 Phi-4-multimodal 61.3 BLINK
14 May 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 61.4 Blink (val), 0-shot

23 system cards report it, from 13 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Jun 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 81.4 BLINK (Table 9) Capabilities
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 68.8 BLINK (Table 2, Reasoning mode). The 3.2 text says 68.7 Capabilities
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 74.3 BLINK (Table 2) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 79.5 BLINK (Table 8) Capabilities
4 Feb 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 70 BLINK (Table 3) Capabilities
30 Jan 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 78.9 BLINK (Table 4) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 66.8 BLINK, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 67.39 Capabilities
1 Jan 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 65.5 BLINK (Val), GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
28 Nov 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report 44.5 BLINK, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) Capabilities
26 Nov 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 67.1 BLINK (Table 2) Capabilities
6 Nov 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 56.7 BLINK (Val), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 57.6 Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 63.1 BLINK (Table 5) Capabilities
25 Sep 2025 gemini-robotics-er-1.5-preview technical report 57.8 BLINK (Table 19, thinking on). Thinking off 65.2 Capabilities
25 Aug 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 61.4 BLINK (val) (Table 5) Capabilities
13 Aug 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 65.3 BLINK (Val), GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
1 Jul 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 65.1 BLINK (Val), GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
11 May 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 72.1 BLINK, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 70.2 Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 38 BLINK, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 39.6 BLINK, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 35.9 BLINK, PT, 0-shot (Table 11) Capabilities
3 Mar 2025 Phi-4-multimodal technical report 61.3 BLINK (test) (Table 1) Capabilities
19 Feb 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 64.4 BLINK val (Table 3) Capabilities
30 Aug 2024 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct technical report 57 BLINK (val), model picks the answer directly (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%